Automatic information exchange comes to Italy

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Automatic information exchange comes to Italy

italy

Antonella Della Rovere and Filipa Correia of Valente Associati GEB Partners look at Directive 2015/2376/EU and its implementation in Italy.

In December 2016, the Italian Council of Ministers presented to Parliament the Draft Legislative Decree for the implementation of Directive 2015/2376/EU. The decree sets out automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation, in particular with respect to advance cross-border rulings and advance pricing agreements (APAs).

The directive, which essentially extended the scope of Directive 2011/16/EU, was issued in December 2015, as one of a number of measures set forth to curb tax fraud and tax evasion. The directive aims at enhancing transparency in relation to tax rulings issued by member states to enterprises regarding proper tax treatment of specific operations, activities or transactions.

Member states were expected to take legislative action to implement the directive by the end of 2016. Implementation of the directive in Italy was provided in Law No. 170/2016. Details on the implementation of the directive are included in the Draft Legislative Decree, on which the Italian Parliament should have expressed its opinion by January 25 2017.

The Draft Legislative Decree provides for the obligation to automatically exchange information on advance cross-border rulings, broadly defined. Hence, such obligation shall apply with respect to (i) preventive agreements for enterprises with international activities (APAs), (ii) preventive agreements in relation to patent box incentives, (iii) ordinary and anti-abuse rulings, (iv) rulings issued in the context of cooperative compliance, (v) advance rulings on new investments, and (vi) any other equivalent type of tax ruling, including preventive agreements regulated under legislation to be issued in the future.

The information on the tax ruling to be communicated to foreign tax authorities includes:

·         Taxpayer identification;

·         Summary of contents;

·         Date of issuance, amendment and/or renewal;

·         Effective period;

·         Type of ruling;

·         Value of the transaction/series of transactions forming the subject-matter of the ruling, provided that its text includes reference thereof;

·         Description of the criteria applied to determine the appropriate transfer pricing method;

·         Identification of any other member state for which the ruling might be relevant; and

·         Identification of any legal persons located in other member states and for which the tax ruling might be relevant.

Furthermore, the Draft Legislative Decree includes provisions for the implementation of Art. 8a of Directive 2011/16/EU, as inserted by virtue of Art. 1 para. 3 of Directive 2015/2376/EU.

According to such article of the directive, the competent authorities of each member state shall communicate to the corresponding competent authorities of all other member states and to the European Commission, through the automatic information exchange channel, any information on the tax rulings they issue, amend or renew as of January 1 2017. Communication to the European Commission serves monitoring purposes and allows evaluation of the effectiveness of the automatic exchange of information regime.

In addition, they must so communicate information on tax rulings issued, amended or renewed within five years prior to the effective date of the directive, i.e., from January 1 2012 to December 31 2016.

In this regard, it is specified that tax rulings issued, amended or renewed in 2012 and 2013 (i.e., from January 1 2012 until December 21 2013) shall only be communicated if they were in effect on January 1 2014.

The above is not the case for tax rulings issued, amended or renewed between January 1 2014 and December 31 2016. Such rulings are subject to mandatory communication under the provisions of the directive, regardless of their validity or invalidity.

The directive seems to take a balanced approach, seeking to protect taxpayers’ rights and interests. To this effect, the information communicated may not lead to the “disclosure of a commercial, industrial or professional secret or of a commercial process or of information whose disclosure would be contrary to public policy” (Art. 8a para. 6b of Directive 2011/16/EU, as amended by Art. 1 para. 3 of Directive 2015/2376/EU).

Finally, bilateral or multilateral APAs with non-EU countries on transfer pricing issues are excluded from the scope of automatic information exchange, where the tax treaties under which they were concluded, do not permit their disclosure to third parties. Such exemption is introduced with a view to ensuring legal certainty. Should the relevant non-EU countries consent to disclosure, the aforementioned exemption shall not apply.



By Antonella Della Rovere and Filipa Correia

Valente Associati GEB Partners





antonella

Antonella Della Rovere

Valente Associati GEB Partners

 

Filipa Correia

Filipa Correia

Valente Associati GEB Partners

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

New reforms represent the most seismic shift in Canadian TP legislation since its enactment and a clear inflection point for MNEs, ITR has heard
Spain did not transpose EU VAT rules for SMEs or works of art; in other news, an increased VAT threshold came into force in South Africa
While the IBS incorporates taxable events previously covered by state and municipal taxes, its governance and operational logic represent a significant departure from the legacy model
The new office on the fourth floor of 4 More London will span 14,230 square feet, with the potential to expand to the first and second floors
MNEs now face a shift from modelling to execution as the side‑by‑side deal forces tax teams to upgrade systems, harmonise data, and prevent costly pillar two mismatches
As recent surveys suggest a disconnect between AI adoption and employee engagement, the big four risk digging themselves into a strategic hole
Almost three-quarters of surveyed tax professionals are concerned about inaccurate AI outputs; in other news, Dentons hired a partner from CMS to lead its Belgian tax team
Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
Gift this article