Brazil: Brazilian Federal Revenue Authorities issue Normative Instruction regulating the tax treatment of dividends, interest on net equity and the equity-pick up method

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Brazilian Federal Revenue Authorities issue Normative Instruction regulating the tax treatment of dividends, interest on net equity and the equity-pick up method

jeffrey.jpg

conomy.jpg

Philippe Jeffrey


Mark Conomy

On September 18 2014, the Brazilian Federal Revenue Authorities (RFB) published Normative Instruction 1,492/2014 (NI1,492/2014) amending Normative Instruction 1,397/2013 (NI 1,397/2013), to regulate changes in respect of the tax treatment of dividends, interest on net equity (INE) and the equity pick-up method, that were introduced by Law No. 12.973/2014 in May 2014. By way of background, in 2007, Law No. 11.638/2007 amended the Brazilian accounting rules set out in Law No. 6404/1976 (the Brazilian Corporations Law) to align Brazilian generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), effective from January 1 2008. To ensure that this accounting change was tax neutral, the Transitional Tax Regime (RTT) was introduced by Law No. 11.941/2009.

NI 1,397/2013 which was published in September 2013, provided guidance on the RTT and broadly speaking required taxpayers to maintain two sets of books, one for accounting purposes and another prepared in accordance with the pre-January 1 2008 accounting principles. NI 1,397/2013 also explained how certain differences between the two sets of books should be treated for tax purposes.

In November 2013, the executive branch of the Brazilian government published Provisional Measure 627/2013 (PM 627) which revoked the RTT and amended other aspects of the tax law. In May 2014, PM 627/2013 was converted into law by Law No. 12.973/2014.

NI 1,492/2014 amends NI 1,397/2013 to reflect the changes introduced by Law No. 12.973/2014, specifically:

  • Taxpayers that opt to apply the Law No. 12.973/2014 from January 1 2014, will be subject to the RTT until December 31 2013. For those taxpayers adopting the law from January 1 2015, they will be subject to the RTT until December 31 2014.

  • For the purposes of calculating INE, the method to be used for determining the annual profits and accumulated profits should be based on the pre-January 1 2008 accounting principles or alternatively based on the method adopted by the Law No. 6404/1976 as amended by Law 11.638/2007 (herein referred to as the new accounting standards). Where the taxpayer has elected to adopt Law No. 12.973/2014 from January 1 2014, it is required to calculate the limit in accordance with the new accounting standards.

  • The value of investments in subsidiaries and affiliates entities should be valued based on the methodology adopted under pre-January 1 2008 accounting principles. Where the taxpayer has elected to adopt Law No. 12.973/2014 from January 1 2014, it is required to calculate the value of investment in subsidiaries or affiliates in accordance with the value of net equity calculated pursuant to the new accounting standards. For the 2014 calendar year, where a taxpayer has not adopted the new law, but holds participation in an entity that has adopted the new law, the value of that investment should also be calculated pursuant to the new accounting standards.

  • Dividends calculated in excess of the pre-January 1 2008 accounting principles accruing between January 1 2008 and December 31 2013 are not subject to taxation. Excess profits accruing between January 1 2014 and December 31 2014 paid will be subject to withholding tax at 15% (or 25% where a foreign beneficiary is located in a tax haven). In the event that the recipient is a Brazilian entity the excess portion will be subject to corporate tax. Any withholding tax levied on the payment to a Brazilian resident should be creditable against the corporate tax due. Where the taxpayer has elected to adopt Law No. 12.973/2014 from January 1 2014 there should be no excess amount subject to withholding tax as the taxpayer should already be calculating dividends under the new accounting standards.

Philippe Jeffrey (philippe.jeffrey@br.pwc.com) and Mark Conomy (conomy.mark@br.pwc.com)

PwC, São Paulo

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
The US president also unveiled a new 50% levy on copper imports; in other news, a UK wealth tax proposal has been criticised by the Institute for Fiscal Studies
Wim Wuyts, who had been head of the specialist tax network since 2017, is moving on to a new role with WTS’s Belgian member firm
MNEs are increasingly using algorithmic tools in TP. Sahasranshu Dash argues that data ethics should therefore plug directly into the TP design process
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales also queried whether HMRC resources could be better spent scrutinising larger entities
Gift this article