Turkey: A new period for tax audits

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Turkey: A new period for tax audits

intl-updates-small.jpg

Future audits undertaken by the Turkish tax authorities will become more transparent and be handled differently.

gozluklu.jpg
bicer.jpg

Burçin Gözlüklü

Ramazan Biçer

The Turkish Minister of Finance, Nağci Ağbal, announced that tax audits will be handled in a new way at a recent press conference. Although he did not clarify what this new way would be, Ağbal said that the Turkish tax authorities will be more transparent during future audits.

In this regard, Turkish tax authorities amended the tax audit guidelines in late September, which introduced new rights for taxpayers to defend themselves during and after the tax audits.

Increased cooperation during audits

In our experience, tax auditors may sometimes request certain documents or data not relevant to a specific tax audit, which increases the burden on the taxpayer. However, the new guidelines will mean that tax auditors will not be able to ask such information if it is not relevant to the subject of the ongoing tax audit.

The changes also intend to increase the cooperation between the tax auditor and taxpayer by allowing the taxpayer to see the tax audit report before it is finalised so that they can develop their arguments against to auditor's claims. In the past, taxpayers only heard the auditor's findings for the first time during the discussion with the report evaluation committee, which is responsible for scrutinising the auditor's report.

In addition, the taxpayer can discuss the auditor's findings and the auditor has to inform the taxpayer about the potential results of the audit report in advance of finalising the audit report.

Taxpayers' new rights

Under the changes, taxpayers will also have the following rights during tax audits:

  • Taxpayers can electronically deliver the documents and data requested by tax auditor;

  • Taxpayers can present explanations and objections that make up a detailed part of the tax audit report;

  • In order to understand the tax auditor's findings and provide their arguments, draft minutes on tax audit findings must be shared with the taxpayers two days before the final audit, including the ultimate conclusions, are mutually signed by the taxpayer and the tax auditor;

  • Taxpayers can choose to defend themselves before the report evaluation committee; and

  • The summarised tax audit report must be forwarded to the taxpayer to inform them of the findings before being heard by the report evaluation committee.

Report evaluation committee

In Turkey, a tax audit is not finalised by a tax audit report.

Where the tax reassessment amount is up to TRY 10 million ($3 million), the audit reports are evaluated by a local report evaluation committee. In cases where the amount is higher than TRY 10 million, the central report evaluation committee must assess the findings within the report.

Where the tax auditor's findings and assessment are not in line with Turkish tax legislation, the report evaluation committee may invalidate and revoke the report. Although this is legally possible, in practice, evaluation committees rarely revoke a tax auditor's report.

In terms of the new guidance, the change is that the taxpayer will know the auditor's findings and claims before being heard by the committee. This change will be quite beneficial for taxpayers to develop strong arguments.

Burçin Gözlüklü (burcin.gozluklu@centrumauditing.com) and Ramazan Biçer (ramazan.bicer@centrumauditing.com)

Centrum Consulting

Tel: +90 216 504 20 66 and +90 216 504 20 66

Website: www.centrumauditing.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Australia’s Department of Finance will also commission an independent review of KPMG’s governance, culture, ethics and integrity frameworks, it has revealed.
In the second instalment of this two-part series, Jayne Stokes takes a practical approach to navigating the capital v revenue question for UK R&D claims for software development, and shares pointers for businesses
ITR's latest podcast considers how transformational the buyout could be in Ryan's quest for global advisory reach and analyses a recent boom in demand for private client advisory services
The event comes at an important moment for professionals dealing with practical realities related to this practice area
Germany’s dogmatic restriction of third-party investment in tax advisory firms will only serve to slow down innovation and access to justice
The Irish government has been told that it’s spending too much of its corporation tax receipts and should instead focus on running bigger surpluses; plus, the IRS is set to merge tax practitioner offices
A company risks double taxation, penalties and inquiry cost if it submits a form with anomalies under the new system, Asker Ali also tells ITR
Arindam Mitra and Robin Hart examine how aggregate TP rules clash with transaction-level customs rules, creating compliance risks and requiring granular, SKU-level pricing strategies
The scandal has come just three years after the PwC tax leaks controversy and has prompted KPMG’s Australian chief executive to resign
In the first of a two-part series on capital v revenue in R&D, Jayne Stokes explores these key concepts and where UK companies need to tread carefully
Gift this article