Global trade tensions and supply chain challenges: transfer pricing considerations for 2025

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Global trade tensions and supply chain challenges: transfer pricing considerations for 2025

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
Map with connecting networks against a background of shaking hands

Jobst Wilmanns and Anna Bolosheva of Deloitte Germany introduce this year’s ITR guide presenting transfer pricing insights across multiple sectors. The articles summarised below feature expert analysis from Deloitte’s international transfer pricing specialists

Transfer pricing under pressure: recent developments and strategic options

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of how tariffs are reshaping transfer pricing strategies. It explores the implications of ad valorem, specific, and compound tariffs on intercompany pricing and supply chains.

Deloitte Germany’s experts offer strategic options for multinational enterprises (MNEs) to adapt their models, including supply chain restructuring, contract renegotiations, and leveraging free trade agreements. The article emphasises the importance of price elasticity, documentation, and proactive planning to maintain compliance and competitiveness in a volatile trade environment.

Automotive industry TP and Europe–US trade tensions: short-term v long-term strategies

Amid ongoing Europe–US trade frictions, the automotive sector faces mounting pressure to rethink its transfer pricing structures. Deloitte Germany’s specialists examine the impact of reciprocal tariffs on European and Asian manufacturers, and outline short- and long-term strategies for MNEs. These include adjusting transfer prices, restructuring supply chains, and evaluating price elasticity to mitigate margin compression and compliance risks.

The article uses illustrative examples to demonstrate how MNEs can preserve arm’s-length margins and adapt to evolving trade policies.

How life sciences and healthcare companies deal with tariffs, disincentives, and grants

Life sciences and healthcare companies are increasingly affected by changing tax incentives, trade barriers, and evolving transfer pricing regulations. Deloitte Germany’s experts assess how global value chains in this sector are responding to OECD pillar two rules, grants, and disincentives such as the US Base Erosion and Anti-Abuse Tax (BEAT) regime.

The article explores the implications for transfer pricing documentation, policy design, and the treatment of R&D incentives. It highlights the importance of unbundling transactions, localising value-adding activities, and monitoring regulatory developments to ensure compliance and optimise tax outcomes.

Economic analysis for TP in turbulent times: do legacy methods still suffice?

With inflation, supply chain shocks, and trade tensions challenging legacy transfer pricing models, Deloitte Central Europe’s specialists propose a framework for evaluating the robustness of economic analyses.

The article discusses alternative methods such as the return-on-assets-based transactional net margin, profit splits, and comparable uncontrolled prices, and emphasises the need for more resilient and adaptive transfer pricing strategies. It also addresses the limitations of outdated comparable data and the importance of revisiting assumptions and input sources to maintain defensibility.

Year-end TP adjustments in China: feasibility and current practice

Deloitte China’s experts provide practical insights into the feasibility and implementation of year-end transfer pricing adjustments in China. The article discusses inbound and outbound adjustments, foreign exchange considerations, and recent regulatory developments, including Shenzhen’s new guidance. It outlines the challenges posed by customs certificate requirements, local practice variations, and potential VAT implications.

The article offers recommendations for managing transfer pricing assessments through proactive planning, documentation, and engagement with banks and tax authorities.

TP controversy perspective: risk allocation within the value chain

Deloitte Spain’s specialists examine how tax authorities are increasingly scrutinising risk allocation within MNE value chains.

The article outlines the OECD’s six-step risk framework and highlights common audit challenges, such as misinterpretation of local expenses and contractual clauses. It provides recommendations for managing tax risk, including conducting proactive risk analyses, aligning transfer pricing policies with functional characterisations, and implementing internal protocols to mitigate controversy.

Financial market volatility and its effects on supply chains and investment decisions

Deloitte Germany’s experts analyse how financial market volatility, foreign exchange fluctuations, and interest rate changes are affecting investment, financing, and supply chain decisions. The article explores the transfer pricing consequences of intragroup financing arrangements, including loans, cash pooling, and guarantees. It discusses the impact of market uncertainty on functional and risk profiles, documentation requirements, and the need for flexible pricing models.

The article also highlights the importance of risk management and the role of treasury functions in navigating volatile environments.

Digital services in the spotlight: TP challenges for cybersecurity and GenAI

As generative AI (GenAI) and cybersecurity reshape global value chains, Deloitte Germany’s specialists explore the transfer pricing challenges of digital services.

The article discusses governance, data valuation, and the treatment of intangible assets, offering practical guidance for MNEs navigating the digital transformation. It presents use cases illustrating the complexities of pricing GenAI tools and centralised cybersecurity services, and emphasises the need for robust functional analyses, documentation, and alignment with evolving regulatory frameworks.

Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (DTTL), its global network of member firms, and their related entities (collectively, the “Deloitte organization”). DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) and each of its member firms and related entities are legally separate and independent entities, which cannot obligate or bind each other in respect of third parties. DTTL and each DTTL member firm and related entity is liable only for its own acts and omissions, and not those of each other. DTTL does not provide services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.com/about to learn more.

This communication contains general information only, and none of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (DTTL), its global network of member firms or their related entities (collectively, the “Deloitte organization”) is, by means of this communication, rendering professional advice or services. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your finances or your business, you should consult a qualified professional adviser.

No representations, warranties or undertakings (express or implied) are given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information in this communication, and none of DTTL, its member firms, related entities, employees or agents shall be liable or responsible for any loss or damage whatsoever arising directly or indirectly in connection with any person relying on this communication. DTTL and each of its member firms, and their related entities, are legally separate and independent entities.

© 2025. For information, contact Deloitte Global.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Luxembourg’s reform agenda continues at pace in 2025, with targeted measures for start-ups and alternative investment funds
Veteran Elizabeth Arrendale will lead the new advisory practice, which will support clients with M&A tax structuring, post-deal integration, and more
MAP cases keep increasing, and cases closed aren’t keeping pace with the number started, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also told an ITR summit
Nobody likes paperwork or paying money, but the assertion that legal accreditation doesn’t offer value to firms and clients alike is false
Ryan hopes the buyout will help it expand into Asia and the Middle East; in other news, three German finance ministers have called for a suspension of pillar two
SKAT, which was represented by Pinsent Masons, had accused Sanjay Shah and other defendants of fraudulent dividend tax refund claims
TP managers must be able to explain technical issues in simple terms, ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum heard
Prudential had challenged HMRC over VAT group relief; in other news, Donald Trump unveiled timber and wood tariffs, and the European Commission published a ViDA implementation strategy
Australia’s CbCR rules have ‘widespread support’ and do not put American companies at a competitive disadvantage, the FACT Coalition said
Baker McKenzie advised two of the member firms involved, while several advisers provided transaction counsel to US-based Grant Thornton Advisors
Gift this article