New Spanish invoicing system requirements: paper billing could still be used (initially)

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Spanish invoicing system requirements: paper billing could still be used (initially)

Sponsored by

Spanish VAT Services logo.jpg
Invoice In Envelope On Monitor Showing Due Payments

Fernando Matesanz of Spanish VAT Services explains how the upcoming introduction of the Verifactu system will affect invoicing processes and potentially steer businesses towards adoption of the SII system

The introduction of the so-called Verifactu system is approaching in Spain, and everything seems to indicate that the ministerial order that will serve to kick off the countdown for this system to come into force is imminent. However, and contrary to much of the related information that is available, the Verifactu project does not refer to the obligation to issue electronic invoices on a mandatory basis. These are two different projects, with different objectives, which come from different sources, and therefore have a different timetable.

Although the publication of the order will happen soon, it is widely expected that the date initially scheduled for the system’s entry into force (July 1 2025) will be postponed. This date appeared in an approved decree and was officially published, so the Spanish lawmakers will have to look for the best legal formula to be able to delay it.

The Verifactu system explained

The Verifactu system refers to the characteristics and requirements that invoicing systems must meet to prevent the manufacture, production, and use of computer systems that allow or facilitate the manipulation or concealment of accounting, invoicing, or tax data that will be used for the production of invoices.

In this way, the Verifactu regulation that will soon come into force is certainly ambitious as it regulates in great detail the characteristics that these invoicing systems must have.

What is really important about these invoicing systems is not the issuance of the invoice, since that is the last step of the billing process, but that the systems must generate registration and cancellation invoicing records that are unalterable and perfectly traceable. To do this, the records must have a unique digital fingerprint that cannot be modified, so that every interaction with the invoicing system is identified and recorded.

Records must also be electronically signed. The information that each of these invoicing records must contain is exhaustive and includes the number and series of the invoice to which the record refers, the date of issuance of the invoice, the identification code of the computer system used for its generation, or the date, hour, minute, and second when the record is generated.

Computer invoicing systems must have the capacity to be able to connect in real time with the Spanish tax administration so that they can voluntarily submit the invoicing records continuously, securely, and automatically to the tax authority. Although all systems must have this capacity for immediate communication with the Spanish tax administration, this communication will be, at the beginning of the entry into force of the regulation, voluntary (the taxpayer must decide whether it wants this communication to be made), but in the future it cannot be ruled out that it will be mandatory.

The producers of these systems must certify, by means of a written declaration, that they comply with all the requirements established by the regulation and may be held liable in the event of non-compliance. That is, if a taxpayer uses, in good faith, an invoicing system that has been declared compliant by its producer and then it turns out that this is not the case, that producer will be responsible for the non-compliance.

Although it is not clearly stated in the Verifactu regulations and a clarification is therefore expected from the Spanish tax administration, all the indications are that taxpayers that create invoices with simple office applications (word processors or spreadsheets) that clearly do not have the status of an invoicing system must stop doing so and will be obliged to acquire a certified invoicing system.

Final thoughts on the Verifactu system

In accordance with all the above, we see how the Verifactu system refers to the characteristics that the computer systems used to produce invoices must have, but not to the invoice itself. In other words, it is perfectly possible – and, in fact, it may be the case for a while – that the Verifactu system comes into force and Spanish taxpayers must therefore have an invoicing system that complies with the regulation but it is used to issue invoices in paper or pdf format, given that the obligation to issue electronic invoices is not yet in force in Spain, and it will not be in the short term (there is currently no date for this requirement).

For all those that do not want, or cannot afford, an invoicing system that meets the characteristics indicated above, the Spanish tax administration is going to offer a public invoicing tool.

However, if one really would like to forget about all the above, what they should do is voluntarily use the SII (real-time VAT reporting) system, since companies that comply with it will be excluded from the Verifactu system. This is undoubtedly the preferred option of the Spanish tax administration, since its desire has always been widespread application of the SII system. Considering the complexity of the Verifactu system, it seems that the administration is one step closer to achieving that goal.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As the firm embarks on a major shakeup of its EMEA partnerships, some staff will be watching nervously
The buyout of Hucke and Associates continues Ryan’s streak of firm acquisitions; in other news, a UK appeal against VAT on private school fees was dismissed
Tax teams are responding to usual client demand in the region, albeit with increased working from home flexibility, local sources indicate
A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Gift this article