Interacting with Chile’s tax administration: A taxpayer view

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Interacting with Chile’s tax administration: A taxpayer view

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-pwc.png
Tax administrations are always looking for ways to improve interaction with taxpayers

Sandra Benedetto Back and Andrés Torrejón Correa of PwC Chile take a look at how taxpayers can interact with the Chilean tax administration to make the complexities of a diverse tax system easier to navigate.

Taxation is usually a distant concept to individuals and entities alike, due to the complexity and different interactions that the tax system and practices entail. The globalisation of commerce and new ways of trading means a new wave of difficulties for taxpayers to carry out their business. This has been exacerbated by COVID-19.

Tax administrations and new legislation are always looking for ways to improve interaction with taxpayers, in order to make the complexities of the diverse tax systems easier (but not necessarily easy) to understand and comply with. 

One of the most evident manners these issues are reflected is through the diverse interpretations the tax administration makes of the tax law. As an example, the Chilean IRS publishes rulings and circular letters frequently. The first acts as interpretations applicable to a case submitted by a consultant taxpayer. The second serves as a systematisation of the Chilean IRS’ view of a particular matter.

After the 2014 tax reform, and following a continued effort to make the tax administration friendlier to its users, a public consultation mechanism was introduced in 2015. This meant the upload of circular letters projects to the Chilean IRS website, where taxpayers are able to post their comments on the project in a 14-day window. This showed preliminary feedback, allowing the administration to foresee the circular letter weak areas and the taxpayers’ areas of focus.

Even though the availability of this system is not new, COVID-19 and the 2020 tax reform has pushed both the administration and the taxpayers to a more extensive use of this online platform. The pandemic skyrocketed the use of digital mediums to interact with all types of institutions, while the second introduced a series of new provisions to be interpreted by the administration and taxpayers alike.

One recent experience is related to one of the 2020 tax reforms most practical changes: the new fiscal definition of ‘resident’, that now follows the OECD countries line and requires a certain number of days of stay. The Chilean IRS considered the application of the residence concept, in principle, for the whole calendar year when a certain taxpayer met the legal threshold (as a side note, given the requirement of a period that ‘exceeds 183 days’, the Chilean IRS set the threshold at 184 days).

This led to a series of comments regarding the extension of the new definition, where diverse taxpayers collaborated, especially regarding the aforementioned interpretation. This public consultation ended finally with improved and, perhaps more importantly, friendlier wording for the concluded circular letter issued on November 25, showing a demonstration of the value of taxpayers’ administration communication and communicability.

The efforts to make processes less complicated for taxpayers is ongoing on a series of fronts. The resolution derived from the aforementioned circular letter established a simplified online procedure to inform the loss of residence or domicile, allowing a less cumbersome process for taxpayers.

Continuing with the digitalisation process, and the expansion of e-commerce and digital services, the 2020 tax reform established a special VAT taxable event, for digital services provided from abroad, to which purpose it created a Simplified VAT Registry, that can be used by service providers from abroad, relieving taxpayers from invoicing and full registration in some cases.

As a final example, the 2020 tax reform introduced a new public institution, the Taxpayer’s Protection Office. This new institution was created in an effort to provide advice and guidance to taxpayers, as a counterweight to the Chilean IRS, especially focused on low-income individuals and entities. The experience related to the Protection Office is yet to be seen, as the national taxpayer’s protector has only recently been appointed, and the office will enter into operation at the beginning of 2022.

As tax reforms happened in rapid succession in Chile – with a high chance of more to come in the medium-term – the mechanisms to approach the tax administration and the interaction with all types of taxpayers will be crucial in allowing correct tax compliance, and more importantly, an easier and friendlier tax system in general.

 

 

Sandra Benedetto Back 

Partner, PwC Chile

E: sandra.benedetto@pwc.com

 

 

Andrés Torrejón Correa

Associate, PwC Chile

E: andres.torrejon@pwc.com 

 

 

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Luxembourg’s reform agenda continues at pace in 2025, with targeted measures for start-ups and alternative investment funds
Veteran Elizabeth Arrendale will lead the new advisory practice, which will support clients with M&A tax structuring, post-deal integration, and more
MAP cases keep increasing, and cases closed aren’t keeping pace with the number started, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also told an ITR summit
Nobody likes paperwork or paying money, but the assertion that legal accreditation doesn’t offer value to firms and clients alike is false
Ryan hopes the buyout will help it expand into Asia and the Middle East; in other news, three German finance ministers have called for a suspension of pillar two
SKAT, which was represented by Pinsent Masons, had accused Sanjay Shah and other defendants of fraudulent dividend tax refund claims
TP managers must be able to explain technical issues in simple terms, ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum heard
Prudential had challenged HMRC over VAT group relief; in other news, Donald Trump unveiled timber and wood tariffs, and the European Commission published a ViDA implementation strategy
Australia’s CbCR rules have ‘widespread support’ and do not put American companies at a competitive disadvantage, the FACT Coalition said
Baker McKenzie advised two of the member firms involved, while several advisers provided transaction counsel to US-based Grant Thornton Advisors
Gift this article