Taxpayers given longer to pay tax in Uruguay

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Taxpayers given longer to pay tax in Uruguay

uruguay-tiny.gif

The General Tax Bureau (GTB) in Uruguay has extended the deadline for corporate income tax (CIT) payments due after the application of the transfer pricing regime and provided additional guidelines about related parties' status.

uruguay-flag.gif

Resolution 818/2010 issued by the GTB applies to corporate income taxpayers who fall under the rule requiring them to file a special tax return as well as fulfill the transfer pricing documentation requirements, corresponding to the fiscal year ending 2009. It allows these companies to pay the income tax originated by the application of the transfer pricing regime, within the ninth month after the closing date of the fiscal year. Until that date, the CIT payment will be exempted from any fines and surcharges.

This benefit will apply only to CIT taxpayers with a fiscal year ending during 2009. Taxpayers with a fiscal year ending in 2010 will be subject to the initial deadline, in other words they will have to pay the CIT within four months from their company’s year end.

In Resolution 819/2010, retroactively effective from December 2009, the GTB states that related-party status applies when the main activity of the entity is derived from agreements on an exclusive basis of agent , distributor, concessionaire or provider of goods, services or rights. The main activity is defined as the activity from which at least 50% of the total income earned by the entity in the corresponding fiscal year is derived.

“The definition of related parties under Uruguayan transfer pricing rules is rather broad,” warns Maria Jose Santos of PricewaterhouseCoopers in Uruguay.”

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
Gift this article