South Korea: Notable 2015 tax law amendments affecting foreign invested companies and foreign individuals

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

South Korea: Notable 2015 tax law amendments affecting foreign invested companies and foreign individuals

shim.jpg

oh.jpg

Jay Shim


Steve H Oh

On December 2 2014, the Korean National Assembly passed legislation that finalises (with some amendments) the tax reform proposal issued by the Ministry of Strategy and Finance last summer. Most of the tax provisions contained in the legislation are effective for taxable years beginning on or after January 1 2015, except for certain provisions for which different effective dates have been assigned. On December 26 2014, amendments for the Presidential Decrees pertaining to the passed legislation were proposed (together, the "2015 Amendment"), which are also generally effective from January 1 2015. Foreign investors should take note of the following provisions in particular:

Stricter thin capitalisation rules

Before the amendment, the rule generally applied where the debt-to-equity ratio of the payer exceeds three to one. The 2015 Amendment reduces the ratio to two-to-one (the six-to-one ratio applicable to the financial services industry remains unchanged) and is effective for taxable years beginning on or after January 1 2015.

It is noteworthy that there is no grandfathering provision with respect to the application of the new two to one ratio, and thus notwithstanding obligations arising from related party debt existed before the amendment; interest accrued and deducted as such from January 1 2015 will be subject to the new two-to-one ratio tax regime. Greater attention would be needed in the immediate future for taxpayers whose debt- to-equity ratios were set to be maximised maintaining the three-to-one ratio under the old rule.

New corporate accumulated earnings tax

This new tax is targeted at large corporations in Korea which have been criticised for hoarding cash rather than reinvesting the surplus cash in the economy. In essence, the new tax is designed to encourage large corporations to use their excessive accumulated earnings to reinvest in their business, to increase the salary and wages of their employees, or to distribute in the form of a dividend. If applicable, a 10% tax will be imposed on retained earnings after deducting investment spending or spending on wage increases and dividend payout.

Proper planning would be required for large foreign investment companies (with more than a KRW 50 billion capital including financial services companies), especially if their foreign investors aim to profit from capital gains through the disposition of their shares in the long run making less distributions over the years. Furthermore, it is notable that there is no special exemption available for the financial services industry where outbound distributions are generally limited by financial regulatory governance.

Stricter resident requirement

Before the amendment, a 'resident' was defined as (i) a person who has a permanent address in Korea, or (ii) a person who has stayed in Korea for one year or more. The 2015 Amendment reduces the test from one year to 183 days.

Once determined as a resident for Korean tax purposes, the resident's income sourced from both Korea and foreign jurisdictions is taxed in Korea. However, individuals who have a permanent address for five years or less during the last 10 year period are taxed on foreign source income only if such income is paid in or transferred to Korea.

Imposition of capital gains tax on income derived from derivatives

Capital gains tax will be imposed on income derived from derivative transactions made on or after January 1 2016 (the Korean government for the past few years attempted to impose a tax on derivatives in the form of a transaction tax instead of capital gains tax). Although a number of supplemental rules and regulations are to be further developed, it is still the case that gains derived from derivatives through a fund (that is, indirect investment) are not taxable under this provision.

New VAT on purchases of electronic services from foreign e-commerce sites

Before the amendment, services provided to domestic customers by domestic programme developers were subject to VAT whereas VAT doesn't apply to the supplies of applications or programmes provided by foreign programme developers. The 2015 Amendment requires foreign application programme developers or e-commerce open marketers (if sales made through open market) to register online for VAT purposes and file VAT returns through the website of the National Tax Service.

New VAT on non-essential financial services

The recent trend to scale back VAT exemptions allowed for the financial services industry appears to continue. The 2015 Amendment includes the providing of non-essential financial services to the scope of taxable supplies subject to VAT.

Extension of statutory deadline for reassessment request

It has long been discussed that a disparity exists between the statutory period in which a taxpayer files a reassessment request (three years from the filing due date of past tax returns) and the statute of limitations which generally allows for five years. The 2015 Amendment extends the filing period for a tax reassessment to five years, but only to the extent that the previous three year reassessment period has not expired (that is, the earliest tax year under which calendar-year based corperate income taxpayers could file a reassessment claim is 2011).

Jay Shim (jaz@leeko.com) and Steve H Oh (Steve.oh@leeko.com)

Lee & Ko, Seoul

Tel: +82 2 2191 3235 and +82 2 772 4349

Website: www.leeko.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Effective audit management requires more than documentation; it’s the way taxpayers engage that can shape audit direction, manage procedural ambiguity, and preserve options for appeal or litigation
American advisers are falling short of client expectations when it comes to providing value-added services, but remaining tight-lipped won’t make the problem go away
Awards
The Social Impact Awards unveil new categories to reflect a changing legal and social landscape
Australia's approach to tax policy has undergone significant shifts in recent years, reflecting global trends and unique domestic considerations. These developments merit close attention from tax professionals
The UK has temporarily dodged the 50% rate due to a trade deal signed with the US in May; in other news, Ryan acquired a Northern Irish tax firm
Following a $28 million funding round, Aibidia wants to ‘double down’ on the US market via partnerships with the ‘big four’, the Finnish TP tech provider’s CEO tells ITR
The Luxembourg-based TP leader tells ITR about relishing the intellectual challenge of his practice, his admiration for Stephen Hawking, and what makes tax cool
The case to determine whether the tariff regime is constitutional will eventually find its way to the US Supreme Court, ITR has also heard
In other news, the Council of the EU pledged support to a CBAM simplification and exemption initiative, and Portugal issued new VAT filing guidance
While Brazil’s sweeping tax updates are a triumph for modernisation, Giuliano Gioia of Sovos warns that MNEs with a Brazilian footprint should be prepared for a short and sharp adjustment
Gift this article