In the Coca Cola India case the Supreme Court said that, because the writ position could not establish the facts of the case, the taxpayer must adopt proceedings before the assessing officer or transfer pricing officer. Hasnain Shroff and Rajan Iyer, of KPMG in Mumbai, analyse the case.
Unlock this content.
The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.
The UK has confirmed its approach to the OECD’s side-by-side deal, but US-parented groups may find pillar two compliance remains far from straightforward
Grant Thornton Advisors’ latest acquisition has produced the fifth-largest US advisory firm by revenue, but there’s still a clear gulf between it and the big four
HMRC expects advisers to meet ever-higher compliance criteria. After 24 consecutive qualified audit opinions, many will ask whether HMRC should hold itself to the same standards
Hany Elnaggar examines how the region's legacy economic substance regimes and the OECD's pillar two framework are converging on the same underlying test