Indian Supreme Court directs officer to continue reassessment

December 01 2010

In the Coca Cola India case the Supreme Court said that, because the writ position could not establish the facts of the case, the taxpayer must adopt proceedings before the assessing officer or transfer pricing officer. Hasnain Shroff and Rajan Iyer, of KPMG in Mumbai, analyse the case.

Unlock this content.

The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.

To unlock this content:

Take a Free Trial or Login

Topics

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Pillar two is revising global tax competition with a 15% minimum tax rate

A taxing week: Pillar two will prosper despite US side-by-side arrangement

The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos

Paul Monaghan, February 27 2026

Direct Tax

This week in tax: PwC commences legal battle with boutique consultancy founded by ex-COO

The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week

Sam Sholli, February 27 2026

Direct Tax

Washington DC Capitol view on cloudy sky background

Ex-US Supreme Court advocate convicted on 12 counts in tax trial

Tom Goldstein, who was represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, denied wilfully cheating on his taxes and blamed errors on his staff

Sam Sholli, February 26 2026

Transfer Pricing

Suited figure pointing to audit among various hexagonal icons

TP documentation in a fragmented world: how to limit audit triggers

Multinationals face rising TP scrutiny as global rules diverge. As Daniel Moalusi argues, strong, consistent documentation is now essential to minimise audit risk and protect tax positions

Daniel Moalusi, February 26 2026

Direct Tax