Why taxpayers should consider relocating to the UK

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Why taxpayers should consider relocating to the UK

Joe Dalton Slashing the corporate tax rate, reforming the controlled foreign company rules and blocking plans for a financial transactions tax are just three ways the government hopes to attract multinationals to relocate to the UK.

A number of UK-based international companies have migrated from the UK to lower tax jurisdictions such as Ireland and Switzerland over the past few years in response to the UK's uncompetitive corporate tax rate and strict controlled foreign company (CFC) rules, among other aspects.

But the tide appears to be turning.

The UK's corporate tax rate has been cut from 28% and will hit 23% by 2014.

Reforms to the much maligned CFC rules are on the way and the coalition has made it abundantly clear the UK will play no part in a European financial transaction tax (FTT).

Global insurance giant Aon's announcement in January that it is relocating its headquarters to London is confirmation the UK's regime is now enabling multinationals to cut their global effective tax rates.

A tax director at a multinational group which is looking to move to the UK told International Tax Review that the CFC reforms are the most significant factor in making the UK an attractive location.

"Our group is seriously considering moving to the UK," said the tax director.

"It will all depend on how the final CFC rules come out but I expect there to be a number of companies migrating to the UK when the new CFC rules are implemented.

"I think the migrations will mostly be similar to the Aon move, involving US-headed groups where the group tax rate is likely to be around 35%, and they can make a large tax saving by coming to the UK."

With the average national corporate tax rate at 35%, and state tax to pay on top, the US regime is quite hostile for multinationals in comparison to the UK. The US also imposes strict CFC rules that deter global companies, while the UK is relaxing its taxation of foreign subsidiaries.

Speaking about Aon's relocation, the tax director said: "I think tax would have played a big part in Aon's move, I imagine they will make significant reductions in their tax bill by moving to the UK and the CFC reforms will have played a part in this."

Updated CFC

Updated draft legislation on the CFC reforms has received positive feedback from taxpayers and advisers.

Miles Dean, of Milestone Tax, said the most significant reform for multinationals is the finance company partial exemption which may allow UK-based multinationals to structure their finance branches in low tax jurisdictions.

"The finance company partial exemption puts the UK on a par with countries like Luxembourg and Switzerland," said Dean.

The tax director said the new CFC rules are much more competitive than those of other G20 countries.

The new rules include an exemption which will allow international businesses to run their intra-group financing function outside the UK.

By establishing their finance function in a low tax jurisdiction within the terms of the exemption, UK-based companies will significantly reduce their UK effective tax rate.

The highest tax rate multinationals will pay on profits of foreign finance companies from overseas intra-group financing will be 5.75%, and there is the potential under the new rules that these profits will be fully exempt from UK tax.

"This will make the UK very competitive within the EU and I think the 5.75% rate will be sufficient to satisfy multinationals," said Dean.

"The UK will have an added advantage as a base for multinationals, since it may enable them to set up exempt trading finance branches in low tax jurisdictions, and then rely on the UK's extensive tax treaty network."

FTT

President Sarkozy's plans to implement a FTT in France could also drive businesses to the UK.

Arnaud de Bresson, a spokesman for Paris Europlace, an industry body representing the French financial market, said an FTT would heavily affect banks, financial institutions, insurance companies and issuers of French stock.

"If the tax was only applied in France it would lead to an inevitable relocation of the activities of affected banks, insurance companies, and management companies for major financial markets," said de Bresson.

A spokesman for the French Banking Federation said the tax will penalise large French companies listed on the Paris stock exchange because it will be levied on the purchase of stocks of companies whose market capitalisation exceeds €1 billion ($1.3 billion).

"This tax represents a significant extra cost for institutional and retail investors and therefore institutional investors may be tempted to favour foreign stocks over French ones, which will have a negative impact on the valuation of French companies," said the spokesman.

The proposals suggest that only the end transaction in a series will suffer the tax, meaning the charge will only be borne by the final buyer and so will mainly impact the issuers of stocks.

Such a disincentive for stocks to be listed in France creates a risk that issuers will relocate – possibly to the UK – to avoid the issue of foreign investors trading French stock in another jurisdiction being liable to the tax.

UK still has pitfalls

Given the UK government's firm opposition to a FTT, London will be an attractive option for any companies looking to migrate from France, following the tax's implementation in August.

But the UK's regime is not without its pitfalls.

The main issues still remaining with the UK regime are the complexity of legislation and the compliance burden on multinationals.

"The new CFC reforms are aimed at simplifying the rules but the compliance burden will still be significant as it will be necessary to test whether a foreign subsidiary is subject to the rules or not and you have to go through this process on an annual basis for every subsidiary," said the tax director.

"For a large multinational, with many companies all over the world, this will be a long and arduous process involving a lot of work, and the complexity of the UK regime often means you have to spend a lot of money on professional advice," the director added.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

India also signed its first-ever bilateral APAs with France, Ireland, Indonesia and Sweden last year, the CBDT revealed
Chile’s revamped GAAR marks a shift toward structural scrutiny, pushing MNEs to strengthen tax governance, economic substance and compliance strategies
New reforms represent the most seismic shift in Canadian TP legislation since its enactment and a clear inflection point for MNEs, ITR has heard
Spain did not transpose EU VAT rules for SMEs or works of art; in other news, an increased VAT threshold came into force in South Africa
While the IBS incorporates taxable events previously covered by state and municipal taxes, its governance and operational logic represent a significant departure from the legacy model
The new office on the fourth floor of 4 More London will span 14,230 square feet, with the potential to expand to the first and second floors
MNEs now face a shift from modelling to execution as the side‑by‑side deal forces tax teams to upgrade systems, harmonise data, and prevent costly pillar two mismatches
As recent surveys suggest a disconnect between AI adoption and employee engagement, the big four risk digging themselves into a strategic hole
Almost three-quarters of surveyed tax professionals are concerned about inaccurate AI outputs; in other news, Dentons hired a partner from CMS to lead its Belgian tax team
Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Gift this article