Indonesia: Late periodic Article 21 income tax returns addressed among new measures

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Indonesia: Late periodic Article 21 income tax returns addressed among new measures

Sponsored by

GNV Green BG.png
Jakarta skyline

Aditya Wicaksono and Reza Farhan of GNV Consulting outline new Indonesian tax provisions concerning penalty waivers, filing extensions, and compliance protections introduced under recent regulations supporting the roll-out of the Coretax system

Director General of Taxes Decree No. KEP-37 of 2026

On February 27 2026, the Indonesian Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) issued Director General of Taxes Decree No. KEP-37/PJ/2026 concerning Tax Policy for Coretax Implementation regarding the Submission of December 2025 Periodic Article 21 Income Tax Returns.

The highlights of the policy are as follows.

Waiver of tax penalty

Taxpayers will not be subject to administrative sanctions in the form of late-filing penalties (as stipulated in Article 7, paragraph 1 of the General Tax Procedures Law (Ketentuan Umum Perpajakan, or the KUP Law)) for the late submission of the December 2025 periodic Article 21 income tax return, provided that the return was submitted no later than the end of February 2026.

Protection of Certain Taxpayer status

The regulation also stipulates that a late submission of the December 2025 periodic Article 21 income tax return will not serve as a basis for revoking a taxpayer’s Certain Taxpayer status (as referred to in Article 17C of the KUP Law), nor as grounds for rejecting an application for such status.

This measure aims to provide legal certainty for taxpayers who consistently maintain high compliance standards.

Implementation

KEP-37/2026 became effective on February 27 2026.

Director General of Taxes Decree No. KEP-55 of 2026

On March 27 2026, the DGT issued Director General of Taxes Decree No. KEP-55/PJ/2026 concerning Tax Policy in Relation to the Implementation of the Coretax Administration System, Particularly Regarding the Submission of the 2025 Annual Individual Income Tax Return.

The policy highlights include the following.

Waiver of penalty for late filing

Individual taxpayers are exempt from an administrative sanction in the form of late-filing penalties (as stipulated under Article 7, paragraph 1 and Article 19, paragraph 3 of the KUP Law) for the late submission of the 2025 annual individual income tax return, provided that the return is submitted no later than one month after the statutory filing deadline.

Waiver of interest penalty for late payment

Individual taxpayers are also exempt from an interest penalty for late payment (as stipulated under Article 9, paragraph 2b and Article 19, paragraph 3 of the KUP Law), provided that the tax return is submitted and the outstanding tax is paid no later than one month after the filing deadline.

Automatic cancellation of tax collection letters

The DGT will not issue a tax collection letter (STP) in relation to the aforementioned administrative penalties. If an STP has already been issued, the relevant DGT regional office will cancel the sanction automatically (ex officio).

Protection of Certain Taxpayer status

The policy also confirms that the late submission of the 2025 annual individual income tax return will not serve as a basis for revoking a taxpayer’s Certain Taxpayer status, nor as grounds for rejecting an application for such status.

Implementation

KEP-55/2026 became effective on March 27 2026.

Director General of Taxes Regulation No. PER-3/PJ/2026

On March 16 2026, the DGT issued Director General of Taxes Regulation No. PER-3/PJ/2026. The regulation aims to provide legal certainty, simplify tax administration, improve taxpayer services, and support the implementation of the Coretax system.

This regulation replaces and revokes certain provisions previously stipulated under Director General of Taxes Regulation No. PER-11/PJ/2025; i.e., Article 2 paragraph 1, letter g; articles 95 to 112; Article 127; and Article 128.

The key regulatory updates include the following.

Obligation to submit tax returns electronically and automatic validation

Taxpayers who are required to submit tax returns in electronic form must do so through the taxpayer portal or other applications integrated with the DGT’s administration system. If a tax return is submitted in paper form, the DGT will not issue a receipt of acceptance, and the tax return will be deemed to have not been filed.

Extension of the deadline for submission of annual tax returns

Taxpayers meeting certain criteria may request an extension of up to two months for submitting their annual tax return by submitting an electronic notification through the taxpayer portal before the statutory filing deadline.

The notification must be accompanied by:

  • A provisional calculation of income tax payable;

  • Provisional financial statements; and

  • Proof of settlement of any tax underpayment (if applicable).

If the DGT does not issue a notification regarding the extension within five working days, the extension will be deemed to be approved in accordance with the taxpayer’s application (articles 5 and 6).

This extension mechanism also applies to individual taxpayers (employees) who have not yet received their Article 21 withholding tax slip from their employer. In such cases, taxpayers may request a filing extension by attaching a statement letter from their employer.

Criteria for tax returns deemed not filed

The regulation sets out detailed conditions under which a tax return may be declared incomplete or deemed to have not been filed. These conditions include situations where the tax return is not signed, required attachments are incomplete, or the return is submitted after the commencement of a tax audit or after the issuance of a tax assessment.

In addition, an amended tax return reporting a loss or tax overpayment will be deemed not filed if it is submitted less than two years before the expiry of the statute of limitations. In such cases, the DGT will issue a notification and delete the receipt data from its administration system (Article 12, paragraph 5 and Article 18). This provision also applies to specific cases, including married women who are taxed separately under the separation of property regime (MT) and taxpayers using the net income calculation norm whose notifications have not been validated in the system.

Treatment of overpayment amounts not considered as tax overpayment

Article 22 stipulates that an overpayment amount reported in a tax return will not be treated as a tax overpayment if it:

  • Arises from rounding differences in the DGT system;

  • Originates from government-borne income tax (PPh DTP); or

  • Results from errors in the inclusion of tax credits that have not been validated by the system.

In such cases, taxpayers are not allowed to submit a refund application, and the amount will not be subject to a preliminary refund procedure or a tax audit.

Exemption from tax return filing obligations for certain individual taxpayers

Individual taxpayers whose income does not exceed the non-taxable income threshold (PTKP) – regardless of whether they conduct business activities, perform independent work, or receive income from a single employer – are exempt from the obligation to submit an annual income tax return, as well as the periodic Article 25 income tax return (Article 20).

Transitional provisions for the 2025 tax year

Extension notifications for the 2025 annual tax return (or part-year 2025 tax period) that have not yet been issued, as well as 2025 individual annual income tax returns received before this regulation came into effect but for which no preliminary refund decision or audit has been initiated, will be processed in accordance with the provisions of this regulation (Article 23).

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While it’s great that the OECD is alive to multinationals’ fears of being caught in a compliance trap, the ‘common understanding’ illustrates a worrying lack of readiness
Rising demand for specialist expertise has fuelled the growth in tax partner headcounts, Cain Dwyer found; in other news, Switzerland has been urged to reconsider pillar two
An OECD report on the taxation of the digital economy is expected by the end of 2026, according to the group of nations
Trophy assets are evolving from personal indulgences to structured investments, prompting family offices to prioritise tax efficiency, governance discipline, and cross-border compliance
As demand for complex, cross-border private client counsel spikes, Patrick McCormick sees opportunity in starting from scratch
As part of an exclusive global alliance, KPMG will become one of Anthropic’s ‘preferred consultants’ for private equity
In the second part of this series, the focus shifts to how taxpayers can manage ongoing risks across the lifecycle of cross-border structures
Jurisdictions have moved to ensure that multinationals are not punished for late GIR filings due to a lack of available filing portals or exchange relationships
HMRC’s push for unified tax adviser registration won’t prevent every instance of improper conduct, but it is good for taxpayers and the UK’s reputation
Elsewhere, the UAE’s tax office has issued an update on registration penalties and two firms have been busy making lateral hires
Gift this article