The strategic rise of tax in AI-driven e-commerce

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The strategic rise of tax in AI-driven e-commerce

Sponsored by

sponsored-firm-vertex-logo.png
Robotic hand emerging from laptop screen pointing to e-commerce icons

Sal Visca of Vertex explains why tax professionals and authorities must evolve to keep pace with developments such as AI-executed transactions and real-time reporting

E-commerce is entering a new era. AI is transitioning from a supporting tool, once used to guide product discovery, into a key decision-making engine embedded at the heart of retail.

Consumers are able to view personalised recommendations and even complete transactions, as seen in Google’s recent rollout of in-chat purchasing through Gemini. Once AI has completed a purchase, it becomes part of a commercial transaction train with a multitude of tax complexities.

When purchases happen guided by AI tools, the question of how tax is calculated, applied, and reported could become part of the equation.

For tax professionals and authorities, these changes are important and are already reshaping how transactions happen.

AI drives the shopping cart

Consumers are already expecting AI to make their experience as seamless as possible. Vertex research has found that nearly one in three shoppers expect retailers to offer AI-driven features during regular and peak shopping periods. These features, from curated gift suggestions to dynamic promotions, are designed to increase conversion and average order value. And they work.

But every AI-generated promotion carries potential tax consequences, such as:

  • Bundled offers can combine taxable and non-taxable items;

  • Location-aware promotions may trigger different jurisdictional rules; and

  • Cross-border recommendations can change indirect tax treatment entirely. 

When the price displayed in an AI chat differs from in-store or marketplace pricing, the tax calculation must stay accurate and consistent. As e-commerce systems become more intelligent and automated, tax determination must operate with the same speed and precision.

When marketplaces multiply complexity

And it is not just mainstream B2C and D2C retailers that face tax complexities. In the past year we have seen businesses and charities call for lower VAT on refurbished electronics purchased through second-hand e-commerce sites such as Back Market or the Restart Project.

Marketplaces across both used and new goods add significant B2B2C challenges. Tax outcomes are often driven by third-party sellers, whose product descriptions and classifications are ingested and auto-categorised by platforms such as Amazon or eBay. This can trigger marketplace facilitator rules; differing VAT, GST, or sales tax treatments; and margin schemes or reduced rates for used goods.

As platforms expand cross-border, they may assume tax collection obligations without physical presence, heightening the need for centralised, AI-driven tax governance.

Omnichannel demands consistency

Social commerce, marketplaces, branded e-commerce sites, and physical stores all coexist; however, this omnichannel reality creates operational strain.

Different channels often run on different pricing engines and tax logic. An AI-generated promotion deployed via social media may not map cleanly to legacy tax systems built for static product catalogues. Real-time bundling can blur tax categories. Flash discounts can create mismatches between advertised and calculated tax. Also, with omnichannel commerce, customers might buy through one channel and return products for refunds in other channels. This requires consistent and accurate management of taxes regardless of the commerce flows.

Incorrect tax at checkout leads to abandoned carts and frustrating customer experiences. And at least as bad are transactions that are processed with incorrect tax, which can cause, for example, reputational damage, audit risks, manual processing for refunds, or adjustments. In a digital-first retail world, tax accuracy is part of the customer experience, and businesses cannot afford for it to be a back-office process.

Structured reporting takes centre stage

With customers buying from an ever-expanding mix of digital platforms, tax authorities need to modernise at the same pace. Without robust tax and compliance systems in place, companies increasingly cede control, allowing jurisdictions to dictate tax obligations in real time, on their own terms.

Worldwide, tax authorities are expanding mandatory digital reporting and structured e-invoicing frameworks. These regimes increasingly require transaction-level data submission in real time, reducing reliance on after-the-fact (‘downstream’) reporting cycles. Transactions occur in milliseconds and in high volume and velocity, and trying to address problems through manual, back-office processes can cause, among others, significant challenges, wasteful cost, audit issues, or penalties.

Retailers must now ensure that:

  • Tax is determined accurately at the moment of sale;

  • Transaction data aligns with jurisdiction-specific VAT or sales tax rules;

  • E-invoices are generated automatically in compliant formats; and

  • Digital reporting obligations are met without manual intervention.

As digital commerce expands globally, structured invoicing and real-time transaction monitoring are becoming essential for scaling e-commerce businesses.

Tax automation as infrastructure

Tax automation is now an essential component of the enterprise infrastructure, with 97% of retailers already automating or planning to automate their tax compliance.

Just as payment gateways and fraud detection keep transactions smooth sailing, automated tax engines need to be in place to support the fully end-to-end transaction life cycle. When paired with e-invoicing and real-time reporting, retailers have clear visibility into every single transaction and can create audit-ready records to run their businesses efficiently at scale. These tax and compliance systems can also ensure the organisations manage their global business and stay ahead of the ever-increasing regulatory and legislative changes.

Retail systems, especially those leveraging AI, must integrate tax logic from the start, instead of it being an afterthought. Real-time tax engines need to operate seamlessly across the omnichannel, supporting mandatory digital reporting and e-invoicing, and maintaining clear records of how tax was applied and reported.

When tax governance is integrated into the core design of AI-driven commerce systems, retailers are better positioned to scale confidently, enter new markets, and withstand regulatory scrutiny. Retailers need tax automation that enhances accuracy while keeping tax outcomes reviewable, governed, and transparent.

Rethinking the role of tax in e-commerce

As intelligent systems take on a more active role in the shopping experience, the underlying frameworks must evolve in tandem.

Rather than reacting to new sales models after they launch, tax needs a seat at the design table. The questions are no longer limited to rates and reporting cycles; they extend to data architecture and the ability to validate transactions in real time across many jurisdictions.

As commerce becomes more automated, compliance must become more intelligent, expansive, and connected, and be able to operate in real time. The retailers that recognise this alignment will build a stronger, more scalable foundation for growth in a rapidly evolving marketplace.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
Gift this article