Italy: VAT group regime in Italy

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Italy: VAT group regime in Italy

rottoli.jpg

Andrea Rottoli

The 2017 Italian Finance Act implemented the VAT group regime in Italy, laid down by Article 11 of the VAT Directive. The provisions will enter into force from January 1 2018 and the regime will be effective as of 2019.

In broad terms, the Italian VAT group regime provides that VAT taxable persons acting as such (i.e. companies and individuals) having financial, economic and organisational links among themselves may opt to be treated as a single taxable person (i.e. a VAT group). Under the VAT group regime, supplies of goods and services between members of the group are no longer relevant for VAT purposes.

To be part of a VAT group in Italy, the following conditions must be jointly met:

  • Taxable persons joining the VAT group must be resident for VAT purposes in Italy;

  • "Financial", "economic" and "organisational" links must be satisfied between the members of the VAT group; and

  • A specific election must be filed with the Italian tax authorities.

A "financial" link is presumed to exist in cases in which a parent company directly or indirectly controls the majority of the voting rights of the subsidiaries. This presumption is rebuttable. The VAT group regime among subsidiaries can also apply if the parent company is established outside of Italy, provided that the state where the parent is established allows an effective exchange of information with Italy. An "economic" link is deemed to exist if the taxable persons concerned carry on similar activities that are ancillary to each other or activities that are substantially for the benefit of one of the participants. Finally, an "organisational" link is deemed to exist if the companies are subject to common coordination (direzione e coordinamento) as provided by Italian civil law.

In any event, "financial", "economic" and "organisational" links are always deemed to be met in case of direct or indirect control of voting rights (i.e. they are presumed to exist in case of a standard group situation). Where "financial", "economic" and "organisational" links are deemed to exist according to the above mentioned presumptions, in order to keep a subsidiary out of the VAT group, a ruling application must be filed to prove the absence of at least one of the above mentioned links.

The VAT group regime is indeed subject to an "all in – all out" rule. If a company, which meets the conditions to be part of the VAT group, does not opt in, then any tax benefit is assessed upon the VAT group as if the company were part of the VAT group. The election into the VAT group regime is forfeited, unless a new option including all subsidiaries is newly filed for the year following the one in which it has been assessed that a company was wrongly left out of the VAT group.

The possibility to be part of a VAT group is excluded for:

  • Non-resident taxable persons;

  • Foreign permanent establishments of resident taxable persons;

  • Taxable persons who are subject to certain pre-emptive judicial measures;

  • Taxable persons undergoing bankruptcy procedure; and

  • Taxable persons undergoing a liquidation/dissolution procedure.

The option must be filed by September 30 of the year before the year in which the regime is intended to apply and is valid for three years. Special rules apply if the "financial", "economic" and "organisational" links cease to exist.

The members of the VAT group are jointly and severally liable for VAT, penalties and interest deriving from assessment and control activities.

The implementation of the VAT group regime rules does not impinge on the possibility to opt for the existing Italian VAT consolidation system that will remain applicable.

Andrea Rottoli (a.rottoli@maisto.it), Milan

Maisto e Associati

Tel. +39 02 776931

Website: www.maisto.it

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

PwC Australia’s response to its tax leaks scandal could give KPMG a useful case study, but so far there’s little sign of positive lessons learned
Tom Goldstein’s attempt to overturn his tax conviction was shot down; in other news, Deloitte promoted several tax partners in Italy
The tax advisory firm becomes the latest member of the Andersen Global network, which has more than 50,000 professionals worldwide
A revised Chapter VII signals a move away from mechanical TP approaches, stressing transaction understanding, functional analysis and context-driven documentation requirements
HMRC’s growing focus on evidencing tax decisions is shifting attention from technical accuracy to governance, requiring businesses to demonstrate how positions were reached and documented
Australia’s Department of Finance will also commission an independent review of KPMG’s governance, culture, ethics and integrity frameworks, it has revealed
In the second instalment of this two-part series, Jayne Stokes takes a practical approach to navigating the capital v revenue question for UK R&D claims for software development, and shares pointers for businesses
ITR's latest podcast considers how transformational the buyout could be in Ryan's quest for global advisory reach and analyses a recent boom in demand for private client advisory services
The event comes at an important moment for professionals dealing with practical realities related to this practice area
Germany’s dogmatic restriction of third-party investment in tax advisory firms will only serve to slow down innovation and access to justice
Gift this article