China tightens tax administration on employee share schemes and technology enterprises

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China tightens tax administration on employee share schemes and technology enterprises

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-kpmg.png
Tax authorities are particularly focused on employee share schemes and technology enterprises

Lewis Lu of KPMG discusses the recent moves on strengthening tax administration on Employee Share Ownership Plan arrangements and tightening scrutiny on high-and-new technology enterprises.

During the period of greatest COVID-19 disruption in 2020, the Chinese tax authorities took a lighter touch on tax enforcement so as not to put additional pressures on businesses, as indeed was the case in many countries. Now, with the recovery of the economy, tax enforcement efforts are also recovering their full vigour, with particular focus areas being employee share schemes and technology enterprises.

New tax reporting requirements for ESOP arrangements

In China, companies implementing a new Employee Share Ownership Plan (ESOP) and looking to access individual income tax (IIT) deferral incentives for their staff must make certain filings. 

There is a full tax reporting in the case of public companies and a so-called ‘recordal’ filing in the case of private companies. With ESOPs seeing ever greater use and an increasing focus on IIT compliance by the tax authorities, these reporting and recordal requirements are now being enhanced in Circular Shui Zong Ke Zheng Fa [2021] No. 69. The enhanced filing requirements supplement those already prescribed in the existing Circulars Caishui No. 35 (2005) and Caishui No. 101 (2016).  

The authorities will now receive more comprehensive information on how the various entities, including employer, ESOP platform, investee entities, are inter-related. The ESOP arrangements of Chinese companies with inverted structures used for overseas listing, so-called ‘variable interest entity’ (VIE) structures, will also be caught by the new reporting.

Apart from enhancing enforcement, it is understood that China tax policymakers are looking to leverage the information they gather from the new reporting to evaluate whether, and in what manner, to extend the existing preferential IIT treatment for ESOPs. This is due to expire on December 31 2021. Enterprises are advised to monitor for developments in this space.

Scrutiny on HNTE status tightened

China’s flagship corporate income tax (CIT) incentive is the 15% reduced CIT rate provided to high-and-new technology enterprises (HNTEs). This compares with the standard CIT rate of 25%. 

Enterprises will often claim this in combination with the super deduction for research and development (R&D) expenses. Further enhancements were made in STA Announcement No. 28 of September 2021. Enterprises are allowed to claim the super deduction of R&D expenses incurred in the first three quarters of 2021 under the provisional CIT filing for the third quarter or the month of September (to be completed in October). Previously, R&D expenses super deduction could only be claimed in the annual CIT filing after the year end.

While the Chinese government provides generous tax incentives to HNTEs, recognition and review of HNTE status are becoming ever more stringent. On-site checks have been made in several cities such as Beijing, Qingdao, Haikou, Suzhou, Guangzhou, and Zhuhai. As disclosed on several official websites, 97 enterprises in Beijing, 220 enterprises in Jiangsu province, and 21 enterprises in Guangdong province have been disqualified from their HNTE status in 2021. 

From September 15 2021 to October 25 2021, the national leading office for HNTE recognition and administration (i.e. Torch High Technology Industry Development Centre of Ministry of Science & Technology) conducted a nationwide inspection on the recognition and administration of HNTE by 36 local offices. 

The inspection focused on whether the HNTE recognition and supervision performed by the local offices was in line with the existing rules and regulations, as well as the implementation of the relevant preferential tax treatment. We expect to see local offices, which in the past may have adopted a more flexible and tolerant approach to awarding HNTE status, take a more rigorous approach going forward.

Given this, enterprises should review the basis on which they secured their HNTE status to ensure this is robust and avoid the risk of the associated tax incentives being clawed back. 

 

Lewis Lu

Partner, KPMG China

E: lewis.lu@kpmg.com

 

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Hotel La Tour had argued that VAT should be recoverable as a result of proceeds being used for a taxable business activity
Tax professionals are still going to be needed, but AI will make it easier than starting from zero, EY’s global tax disputes leader Luis Coronado tells ITR
AI and assisting clients with navigating global tax reform contributed to the uptick in turnover, the firm said
In a post on X, Scott Bessent urged dissenting countries to the US/OECD side-by-side arrangement to ‘join the consensus’ to get a deal over the line
A new transatlantic firm under the name of Winston Taylor is expected to go live in May 2026 with more than 1,400 lawyers and 20 offices
As ITR’s exclusive data uncovers in-house dissatisfaction with case management, advisers cite Italy’s arcane tax rules
The new guidance is not meant to reflect a substantial change to UK law, but the requirement that tax advice is ‘likely to be correct’ imposes unrealistic expectations
Gift this article