MNEs struggle in interim between UK and EU VAT reforms

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

MNEs struggle in interim between UK and EU VAT reforms

Tax teams are bridging the gap as they wait for the EU VAT reforms in July

UK multinational enterprises (MNEs) face difficulties following Brexit and the UK’s VAT reforms as they wait for the EU’s Import One Stop Shop (IOSS) to be introduced in July.

Businesses must find clarity on the definitions of intermediaries, marketplaces, and presence, as they prepare for the EU’s project to modernise VAT, which will be introduced in July. While the UK and EU are introducing similar reforms to improve VAT process for MNEs, the six-month difference in timelines has caused problems for UK businesses, and complications arising from Brexit have exacerbated the situation.

“You have six months of, what do we do from January to July?” said Sandy Cochrane, VAT director at Mazars.

A combination of companies failing to prepare for Brexit, the late signing of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) on December 24 2020, and timeline discrepancies on VAT reforms have forced UK businesses to make difficult decisions regarding their tax choices and supply chains.

The UK’s VAT reforms came in on January 1 2021 while the EU’s equivalent, the Modernising VAT for cross-border e-commerce reforms, are due on July 1. The EU’s changes include the launch of the One Stop Shop (OSS) for EU businesses and the Import One Stop Shop (IOSS) for non-EU companies.

The low-value import VAT exemption for goods worth less than €22 ($27) will also be withdrawn, and VAT will be charged at the point of sale for goods valued at under €150. The reform will make online marketplaces the deemed supplier for VAT purposes.

MNEs are welcoming the changes that will remove the time-intensive requirement for companies to register for VAT in multiple EU jurisdictions.

“One of our companies is registered in at least seven or eight different countries due to the supply chain,” said Artur Torres Pereira, European VAT manager at Klöckner Pentaplast. Although his company is B2B and therefore not affected by the reforms, Torres Pereira is looking forward to the day when the reforms are extended further.

“[The EU reforms are] one step closer to a much more efficient VAT system in the EU,” he said.

However, for UK businesses, the changes have come sooner than for their EU counterparts. The UK’s exit from the EU on January 1 2021, combined with the VAT reforms, has created confusion and difficulties for MNEs.

“I love the idea of having just one VAT return, but it’s not easy to get there,” said one tax director at a luxury goods MNE.

UK MNEs lose the EU distance selling threshold

One of the biggest problems for UK MNEs is the loss of the EU’s distance selling threshold simplification. Under this rule, EU sellers are required to register for VAT in another EU state only when they exceed the annual distance selling threshold for a specific country.

UK businesses lost this advantage after Brexit, but they are not able to use the EU’s IOSS until July. Companies may be forced to deal with the trade as an import into the EU, and Alan Pearce, VAT partner at Blick Rothenberg, said that if the product is worth more than €22, requirements could include a customs declaration, customs duty under EU tariff rules, and import VAT.

“It’s a massive amount of extra administration,” he added.

The other option for MNEs is to sell products at a price that does not include duty and taxes, which means the customer would receive a VAT and customs bill from the delivery agent. However, companies have reported negative experiences with customers who have been hit with an unexpected bill.

Some companies are using a third, hybrid system, in which a delivery agent pays the VAT on behalf of the customer and bills the supplier for it later. Most delivery agents will offer this service, but tax directors should be aware that they may require payment of the import duties in advance, depending on the relationship with the supplier.

Tax teams are looking forward to some consistency and simplification when the EU VAT reforms are introduced in the summer. In the meantime, there are plenty of issues for tax teams to consider.

Considerations for MNEs

EU tax law allows member states some freedom to determine their own rules, and some are likely to have more administrative requirements than others.

“There is a flexibility that could create more frustration, but it could also simplify things for businesses,” said Cochrane.

While all EU countries will require non-EU established businesses to appoint a local intermediary, some will require extra guarantees. However, countries with fewer extra requirements will have a competitive edge, and tax professionals told ITR that MNEs should consider this when deciding which EU state to register and file the IOSS.

“There’s a bit of country shopping to be done to strike the right balance between the commercial requirements and the administrative constraints of the EU member state concerned,” said Pearce.

Andy Spencer, director of consulting services at Sovos, also pointed out that the requirement for an intermediary is being interpreted differently by member states. In some, an intermediary is viewed as having joint liability with the taxpayer, but not in others.

This intersects with the Mutual Assistance Recovery Directive (MARD) which could mean that EU countries do not require a local and liable intermediary in order to do business, although some uncertainty remains. “That’s still in a state of flux but hopefully will be resolved fairly quickly,” said Spencer.

Tax advisors also told ITR that there is a risk of companies being categorised as a marketplace if they sell third-party goods, increasing their VAT liability. Spencer noted that the rules under the VAT reform are not yet fully clear. “The mechanisms are simpler, but complexity arises in who has liability to account for that VAT,” he said.

Finally, the luxury goods tax director said there is a question about how substantially present an MNE must be in the EU to qualify to use the OSS. “There is uncertainty as to what presence a non-union business would need to have,” they said.

Intersecting issues

The difficulty for tax directors at large MNEs appears to be balancing the uncertainties and demands of multiple events that have unfortunately coincided. The delays to Brexit, and then the late publication of the TCA, left many UK-EU businesses scrambling to solve customs and VAT problems.

At this time, businesses are dealing with the fallout of Brexit without benefitting from the simplifications offered by the EU’s VAT reforms. The risks are high and tax advisors have seen their billable hours spike in 2021 as MNEs seek clarity and reassurance.

Nonetheless, the questions are not purely fiscal. Tax professionals advised that MNEs should take a holistic view of the situation and weigh up commercial objectives in tandem with VAT considerations to achieve the best outcome.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The new office on the fourth floor of 4 More London will span 14,230 square feet, with the potential to expand to the first and second floors
MNEs now face a shift from modelling to execution as the side‑by‑side deal forces tax teams to upgrade systems, harmonise data, and prevent costly pillar two mismatches
As recent surveys suggest a disconnect between AI adoption and employee engagement, the big four risk digging themselves into a strategic hole
Almost three-quarters of surveyed tax professionals are concerned about inaccurate AI outputs; in other news, Dentons hired a partner from CMS to lead its Belgian tax team
Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
Gift this article