Treading water

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Treading water

editorial

Achieving transparency, whether as a taxpayer or tax authority, can often feel like you are treading water.

Achieving transparency, whether as a taxpayer or tax authority, can often feel like you are treading water. When it feels like you are getting closer to the shore, another wave of proposals, each with new rules and threats of controversy pushing you out into open water.

Internal procedures, data gathering, analytics, and clear policies all play a key part in achieving transparency. However, transparency initiatives are vulnerable to subjective judgements (page six).

Nevertheless, companies are often accused of pursuing the lowest effective tax rate possible. Many companies are now focused on educating tax authorities, stakeholders and the public to explain how they pay their taxes (page 74). Meanwhile, The B Team has found a framework that it believes could work for many large businesses (page 20).

Many reading this will argue that this is a problem for taxpayers as they aim to comply and protect their business reputation. However, tax authorities are dealing with the same challenges.

Country-by-country reporting (CbCR) and the automatic exchange of information (AEOI) are just two transparency initiatives where it is not entirely clear how governments are analysing and using the data. There are still deep trust issues partly because of this. Furthermore, if tax authorities are viewed as more aggressive and less trustworthy, taxpayers will be ever-more cautious about how open they are with their tax affairs.

It's a vicious circle between taxpayer and tax authorities, but what makes it tougher are tax justice networks fighting for more transparency and fairness. Despite the CbCR and AEOI initiatives being introduced, it's not enough for some non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and they continue to push the debate further (page 40). These networks, while performing an essential service, are not letting taxpayers and governments rest.

No matter what policies are put in place, it seems the water beneath our feet is always getting deeper as NGOs push the boundaries. Many will be trying to stay afloat and avoid getting lost at sea.

Anjana Haines
Managing editor, International Tax Review
anjana.haines@euromoneyplc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
Gift this article