Brazil’s challenge to becoming a member of the OECD
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil’s challenge to becoming a member of the OECD

Sponsored by

BaseFirma
Brazil OECD - Large

Brazil made a formal application to join the OECD in 2017, but the process is still mired with political uncertainty. BaseFirma's Davi Santana de Jesus outlies how the economy can expedite its application by reforming its transfer pricing framework.

In May 2017, Brazil sent a formal request to join the OECD. The Brazilian government believed that becoming an OECD member would help attract foreign investment into the economy. However, the acceptance of Brazil as an OECD member is currently uncertain.

Just a few years ago, Brazil’s chances for acceptance into the OECD were much more favorable.

Brazil’s historical membership bids

In 2009, the former OECD Secretary Angel Gurría, who was visiting Brasília to present an analysis on the Brazilian economy, noted that “the possibility of Brazil becoming a formal partner of the OECD is up to the Brazilians; our doors are open to Brazil".

Such an invitation was to be evaluated by Guido Mantega, the former Brazilian Finance Minister. However, at the time, Mantega expressed a lack of interest in the invitation. Subsequently, the opportunity to join the OECD then was missed.

Nowadays, the conditions to join the OECD have changed, and Brazil’s 2017 request has been subject to a more stringent evaluation with additional requests for economic adjustments and the possibility to be subject to veto by OECD member countries. Currently, Mexico, Chile and Colombia are the only Latin American members of the OECD.

Following Brazil’s application for OECD membership in 2017, which was supported by former President Michel Temer, several lobbying attempts by the Brazilian authorities have been made to expedite the process.

At the beginning of 2018, Henrique Meirelles, the then Finance Minister, along with Angel Gurría, the OECD Secretary-General, and Jorge António Rachid, the Secretary of the local tax authorities, launched an OECD-Brazil work programme to start making local transfer pricing (TP) rules more compatible with the OECD TP guidelines. This programme seeks to align Brazil’s rules and unique characteristics with internationally accepted practices.

OECD membership requirements

The decision to accept Brazil into the OECD is now partly dependent on the OECD Committee for Tax Affairs, one of the 23 committees that advise the OECD Council. The committee’s assessment, which is related to local TP rules, can vary ranging from:

  • Acceptance;

  • Acceptance with a specified deadline for implementation;

  • Acceptance after reservations or modifications to local TP rules, to rejection of local TP rules.

The 23 OECD Committees deal with various topics that range from fiscal, to the environment, education, and policies specific to topics such as the working group on bribery on international business transactions, which are all guided by OECD's core values.

These core values include a commitment to pluralistic democracy based on the rule of law, respect for human rights, adherence to open and transparent market economy principles, and sustainable development.

The recent election of Jair Bolsonaro as the new president of Brazil, and Paulo Guedes as Finance Minister, has raised doubts on whether the government would continue to seek membership of the OECD. However, last January, during the World Economic Forum at Davos, Guedes met with Gurría and indicated Brazil's intention to enter the OECD as soon as possible. The OECD secretary characterised the meeting as very productive.

OECD veto

As mentioned above, the acceptance of Brazil to the OECD is subject to veto from its members. In March 2019, during a state visit by the Brazilian president to the US, Bolsonaro secured US President Donald Trump's support for the country’s entry into the OECD. However, Trump’s support did not come free, and came with conditions that notably included Brazil renouncing preferential treatment as a "developing country" by the WTO.

Protectionism and preferential treatment of developing countries by the WTO was harshly criticised by Trump in a press conference in October 2018. He noted:

They charge us what they want…If you ask some people, they say that Brazil is among the toughest in the world – may be the toughest in the world. And we don't call Brazil and say, ‘Hey, you're treating our companies unfairly, treating our country unfairly….’

BaseFirma believes that Brazil’s acceptance to the OECD should not be contingent upon its non-inclusion in the list of countries that the WTO supports in its effort to overcome poverty and become more developed.

That was not the case for countries such South Korea, Mexico and Turkey, which are members of both the G20 and the OECD, and are also included in the WTO’s list of developing countries.

Transfer pricing alignment

From a local perspective, BaseFirma supports aligning Brazilian TP rules with the OECD model in order to create a more favorable treatment of multinationals doing business in Brazil. 

Brazil’s unique methods in testing import and export transactions with fixed statutory margins fail to consider risks and functions assumed by the local entity. The required fixed margins may require up to a 66% mark-up for tangible goods imported from related parties, depending on the company's economic sector.

If Brazil wants to minimise the reasons why OECD members may veto its acceptance, it should start by giving up its current TP system, and re-design it to be more in line with internationally accepted principles.

Taxpayers and international investors have been waiting for changes to the Brazilian TP rules for decades. It is about time to move on and make it easier to do business in Brazil.

Davi Santana

Davi Santana de Jesus

This article was written by Davi Santana de Jesus (davi.santana@basefirma.com) of BaseFirma Brasil.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

UK tax credit consultancy ForrestBrown also warned that advisors must get up to speed in order to support their clients
Large firms like EY risk losing staff for good if they track attendance, a prominent former management consultant for the firm has warned
Research has claimed that the net US federal income tax bills of 35 companies were negative $1.72 billion, while, in other news, Italy’s economy minister has predicted that pillar two will fail
Janet Truncale has handed two out of four global managing partner roles to defeated leadership rivals
A survey of more than 25,000 in-house lawyers reveals that embracing technology could help law firms win new business
The appeal related to deductions claimed by the Singaporean telecoms company, which was advised by PwC, on a A$5.2 billion acquisition from 2002
The latest wave of cuts follows chastening revelations regarding the ‘big four’ firm’s tax leaks scandal
UN proposals to reform the taxation of the aviation industry would lead to substantial economic cost for developing countries, argues Willie Walsh, director general of the International Air Transport Association
An anonymous litigation financier whose identity UK law firm Mishcon de Reya is said to know is allegedly covertly attacking tax transparency regulation
Silvana Van der Velde adds that thus far she has come across pillar two when it comes to joint venture agreements
Gift this article