Regulators tackle liability of foreign employees

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Regulators tackle liability of foreign employees

The tax authorities have released a draft circular on the taxation of internationally mobile employees. The final version will be published officially within the next few weeks. The circular brings a number of decrees from the past few years together in a single document, and so serves as a good overview of the special features of expatriate taxation.

Two items of substantive change are worthy of note. For the first time, the tax authorities set out in detail their view on the tax liability of a foreign employee working for less than 183 days in Germany. They see his remuneration as taxable if his relationship with a German company amounts in substance to an employment (so-called "economic employer"). This is particularly relevant to multinational groups with short-term assignments between affiliated companies. The concept of economic employer will also be applicable to employees on assignment abroad and will therefore often be crucial in determining whether the German employer is entitled to stop accounting for tax withholdings. The second major novelty is to be found in the taxation of employee stock options. Until now, the approach has been to tax the benefit on exercise of the option and – where residence has changed in the meantime – to apportion it according to the length of time spent in Germany between the grant and exercise dates. The German tax authorities now want to follow the OECD's proposal to allocate the gain on the basis of the period between grant and first possible exercise of the option.

Both expatriate programme and tax managers will find a review of their international assignment policies and practices in the light of the new circular a rewarding and constructive exercise.

Oliver Schmidt (oliver.schmidt@de.pwc.com), Hamburg

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

HMRC’s push for unified tax adviser registration won’t prevent every instance of improper conduct, but it is good for taxpayers and the UK’s reputation
Elsewhere, the UAE’s tax office has issued an update on registration penalties and two firms have been busy making lateral hires
The case sits within a context of Brazil signalling that it is replacing informal discretion and ambiguity with structures that reward analytical rigour, one expert tells ITR
Jeff Soar lifts the lid on WTS UK’s ambitious recruitment plans, the firm's positioning against the big four, and why tax is the perfect profession for AI
The move reinforces Milan’s role as a key European hub for international business, the firm said
Australia’s government has also announced that it will implement the pillar two side-by-side agreement
Sara Morgan is due to join Joseph Hage Aaronson & Bremen as a partner in London, ITR understands
The newly combined tax team has already worked on thousands of joint client matters, leaders from McDermott Will & Schulte tell ITR
As AI becomes increasingly intuitive and idiot-proof, its tax applicability is becoming impossible to overstate
New data on public CbCR showed uneven adoption, as Singapore advanced pillar two compliance and firms expanded their tax capabilities
Gift this article