Sarbanes Oxley bites in Germany

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Sarbanes Oxley bites in Germany

The US Sarbanes Oxley legislation, which prevents firms from providing certain tax services to audit clients and imposes strict rules to ensure auditor independence, is forcing tax advisers in Germany to consider their career development options

The US Sarbanes Oxley legislation, which prevents firms from providing certain tax services to audit clients and imposes strict rules to ensure auditor independence, is forcing tax advisers in Germany to consider their career development options.

Nicole Looks, formerly head of value-added tax (VAT) at KPMG in Germany, who has just moved to Baker & McKenzie, the international law firm, gave the restrictions that Sarbanes Oxley imposes on accounting firms as the reason for her move.

McDermott, Will & Emery, another US law firm, picked up a highly-respected team of tax lawyers from Deloitte-affiliated law firm Raupach & Wollert-Elmendorff in a similar move. Again, Sarbanes Oxley constraints were the main reason for the switch.

"There are restrictions on the work of accounting firms from Sarbanes Oxley," said Looks. "They have to obey strict rules of independence and this prevented me from doing all the tax work I used to be able to do."

Arnt Raupach, who took three colleagues with him when he moved to McDermott, Will & Emery on July 1 2004, agreed: "Sarbanes Oxley is a problem for our clients in several jurisdictions. I think the German legislation will move in the same direction in the future."

The Sarbanes Oxley legislation affects not only US companies, but their affiliates as well. In Germany, any multinationals that have a US company in the group is caught by the law and must obtain internal audit committee approval for any tax advice its auditor wishes to provide.

Looks, who had been at Baker & McKenzie until 1993 when she joined KPMG, began the task of building an indirect tax practice at the US firm's Frankfurt office on June 1 2004.

ITR Week welcomes your feedback on this or any other story. Please email the author with your comments. Letters may be published online.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2026 showed why harmonisation remains elusive, advisers must raise their game, and ‘everyone’s data is rubbish’
The firm’s board has reportedly asked Kevin Burrowes to continue until 2028 as the KPMG Australia scandal raises expectations of regulatory reform
A former Deloitte partner will lead the firm’s latest geographic expansion; in other news, Baker McKenzie added six tax lawyers to its partnership
The Fair Tax Mark now extends to domestic-only companies with turnover above €1m, with Thai travel operator Tripseed the first to be certified
A technology provider had to be educated on technical requirements by Joseph Ribkoff’s IT team, a tax manager at the company said
But businesses should remain flexible when choosing between internal and external resources to handle added ViDA complexity, ITR’s Indirect Tax forum also heard
Non-compliance from small businesses continues to account for most of the gap, HM Revenue and Customs revealed
The new managing director of R&D tax relief consultancy ForrestBrown tells ITR about his priorities for the business, where he’s focusing his time and what makes tax cool
PwC Australia’s response to its tax leaks scandal could give KPMG a useful case study, but so far there’s little sign of positive lessons learned
Tom Goldstein’s attempt to overturn his tax conviction was shot down; in other news, Deloitte promoted several tax partners in Italy
Gift this article