Brad Rolph of Charles River Associates in Canada takes a closer look at the memorandum of understanding (MOU) on arbitration between the US and Canada and the accompanying arbitration board operating guidelines. He also examines whether the arbitration procedure is accomplishing its objectives to reduce the amount of time it takes to resolve double taxation cases and increase the use of principle-based negotiating positions.
Unlock this content.
The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.
Geopolitical rivalry is reshaping global tax cooperation, as the OECD’s minimum tax framework fragments and the EU grapples with the ensuing legal fallout
Chile’s revamped GAAR marks a shift toward structural scrutiny, pushing MNEs to strengthen tax governance, economic substance and compliance strategies
While the IBS incorporates taxable events previously covered by state and municipal taxes, its governance and operational logic represent a significant departure from the legacy model