Albania: Albanian transfer pricing regulations

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Albania: Albanian transfer pricing regulations

sagianni.jpg

lena.jpg

Anastasia Sagianni


Erion Lena

Transfer pricing rules have been present for more than a decade in the Albanian Corporate Income Tax (CIT) Law, but specific and detailed regulations on the application of these rules have been published in the Official Journal No 70, dated May 20 2014. The recent changes have totally transformed Article 36 of the Law on Income Tax (No. 8438, dated December 28 1998) by adding seven more articles related to specific rules and actions.

Who is affected?

Companies and groups of companies with related party transactions are affected by transfer pricing rules.

Related party definition

An entity is considered a related party if there is a possibility of exercising control over, or exerting considerable influence on, business decisions made. The direct or indirect possession of at least 50% of the shares in capital shall mean that control over the taxpayer is possible.

The case of direct or indirect possession of at least 50% of the voting rights is considered as having an influence on business decisions.

Type of transactions

The type of transactions subject to transfer pricing are: product sales; product acquisition; lendings; borrowings; royalties; management fee payment; provision of management services; cost-sharing within the group; research and development activities; provision of other services; and use of other services.

Transfer pricing methods

The taxpayer should choose one of the methods described in the OECD guidelines. Taxpayers should also describe the decisive reasons for the determination regarding the method used for the reconciliation of the transfer prices with the arm's-length principle for the transactions carried out with the associate enterprises.

The taxpayer should choose one of the following methods:

  • Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method;

  • Resale Price Method;

  • Cost Plus Method;

  • Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM); or

  • Profit Split Method.

The taxpayer can use another method only if none of the above methods can be reasonably applied.

Transfer pricing audit and penalties

In case of a potential tax audit, the Tax Administration should perform the same transfer pricing method used by the taxpayer.

Another important change is introduced in the Law no. 9920, dated May 19 2008 "On Tax Procedures" with penalties related to transfer pricing being added (Article 115/1). Previously, no provision or penalties regarding transfer pricing were in force.

Reporting deadlines

Transfer pricing documentation is to be submitted to the Tax Authorities in Albania on an annual basis by filing a "controlled transaction report", the submission timeframe of which shall be determined by the Ministry of Finance.

Advance pricing agreements (APAs)

Taxpayers that carry out transactions with related parties may address the tax authorities to obtain an APA regarding the conditions and methods of determining the transfer pricing. Specific announcements will be issued, related to APAs, by the Ministry of Finance.

Anastasia Sagianni (anastasia.sagianni@eurofast.eu) and Erion Lena (erion.lena@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global, Tirana Office

Tel: +355 69 533 7456

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR's podcast examines whether the big four have overarching cultural issues and assesses the competitive threat of technology-backed transfer pricing firms
The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
ITR spoke to multinationals, advisers and software providers about a June 30 deadline defined by faulty portals, high compliance costs and hard lessons
After years of onerous pillar two prep, businesses will be galled in seeing tax revenues outweighed by compliance costs
Tax advisers should revisit India secondment arrangements after the EY US ruling strengthened the Centrica precedent and raised fresh withholding concerns
Despite the shortfall, effective tax rates of multinationals have seen a ‘statistically significant rise’
After joining Milbank from Akin Gump, the fund tax specialist discusses sponsor demand, practice building, and the tax challenges facing asset managers
Partner payouts could also be reduced by a fifth, it has been reported
Gift this article