Last chance to submit for World Tax and Transfer Pricing 2018

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Last chance to submit for World Tax and Transfer Pricing 2018

World Tax submit form questionnaire

The submission period for World Tax and World Transfer Pricing 2018 has ended. Firms interested in making submissions should contact their country's researcher immediately if they have missed the deadline.

If you have missed the World Tax and World Transfer Pricing deadline, which was on Friday May 12, and have not yet told us about this, you should contact the lead researcher for your region immediately to arrange a late submission.

The researchers are:

Sandra Ekpo for the Americas: sandra.ekpo@euromoneyplc.com

Tessa Neal and Josh White for Europe, Africa, Russia and Turkey: tessa.neal@euromoneyplc.com and josh.white@euromoneyplc.com

Ehi Ogona for Asia and Oceania: ehi.ogona@euromoneyplc.com

Joe Stanley-Smith, World Tax editor, should be copied in. His address is joseph.stanley-smith@euromoneyplc.com. Submission forms can be found below. 

About World Tax and World Transfer Pricing

The directories, which are released annually, are key resources for helping tax executives locate specialist advice. Each edition rates the tax expertise offered in more than 50 jurisdictions globally, giving companies the most comprehensive information about the market for tax advice.

As companies grapple with the shifting global tax landscape, with fresh challenges such as the BEPS Project, increases in transparency and the upcoming US tax reform to negotiate, tax advice is more important than ever.

World Tax and World Transfer Pricing are unique in that they classify professional services, law firms, boutiques and other tax advice providers together, rather than looking at them separately, because they undoubtedly compete for work.

Research process

A change from last year is that there will be a separate questionnaire for each country. The questionnaires, downloadable below, can be downloaded by clicking on the links. If you are unable to download a form, a member of our team will be able to send it to you.

Researchers conduct interviews with several firms in each jurisdiction, as well as with clients and International Tax Review’s own database of corporate contacts. For details on ranking methodology, and to see the results of last year’s research, please visit http://www.itrworldtax.com/general/about.

Questionnaires

Please click on the below links to download questionnaires.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR understands that UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves will announce a consultation on the proposed financial reward scheme, which had left advisers fretting
The long-running dispute centres on Medtronic’s use of the comparable uncontrolled transaction TP method; in other news, Paul Hastings and FTI Consulting both made double tax hires
The boutique Australian firm’s TP award recognition proves that world-class advisory services aren’t limited to the ‘big four’, the firm’s founder tells ITR
Canadian and Indian dual VAT models have been a source of inspiration for the Brazilian model, but the latter has unique and innovative features, the OECD paper claimed
More sophisticated use of technology, heightened TP scrutiny and stricter filing requirements are making South African Revenue Service audits a formidable challenge
The hire of Doug Wick expands Baker McKenzie’s state and local tax practice and adds to the firm’s growing ex-IRS expertise
One year after Nuwaru joined the WTS network, leaders James Jobson and Matthew Missaghi reflect on the firm’s mission to offer mid-tier pricing but deliver top-tier results
Join ITR's Head of Research, John Harrison, for an overview of key dates, new developments, best practices, and more for next year’s research cycle
The president’s tariff regime has already caused misery for taxpayers. Losing at the Supreme Court would mean it was all for nothing
The US itself was the biggest loser of tax revenue to American multinationals’ profit shifting, the Tax Justice Network reported; in other news, firms made key tax hires
Gift this article