All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

This week in tax: Janet Yellen raises hope for digital tax agreement

Janet Yellen, US Secretary of the Treasury

The appointment of Janet Yellen to US Secretary of the Treasury has created global optimism that an international agreement on the digital tax framework may be possible this year.

Yellen was voted-in unanimously by the US Senate Finance Committee to replace Steven Mnuchin, who suspended OECD-led talks with other countries on the two-pillar digital tax approach in June 2020. Corporate confidence is high on Yellen restarting negotiations after she stressed that efficient taxation of multinational companies was a priority.

“Working in the context of the OECD negotiations on global taxation, we have much greater leverage to keep our American firms competitive if we avoid a race to the bottom in corporate taxation more globally,” said Yellen at the US Senate on January 19, showing her support for pillar two regarding a global minimum tax.

Yellen’s appointment on January 22 also makes a carbon tax more likely to become part of US policy in the near future. The former chair of the Federal Reserve is a long-time advocate of carbon taxes and was a member of the Climate Leadership Council (CLC) for many years.

As the OECD waits for the Biden administration to take shape, the pace of digital tax reform has not slowed down. The public meeting of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on January 27/28 saw finance ministers from Canada, Germany, Italy, Indonesia, Jamaica and the UK stress the need for multilateral digital tax solution, but more work still needs to be done.

Before the event, the OECD's Head of Transfer Pricing Stewart Brant spoke to ITR about his team's work on pillar one in 2021 and a new knowledge-sharing initiative.

Meanwhile, the Inclusive Framework (IF) meeting also involved discussions on the global economic outlook and impact of COVID-19, while senior international experts examined how tax can help deliver on the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

Other discussions were focused on tax morale among businesses and how to strengthen it, the future of international taxation, tax certainty, tax transparency and tax administration 3.0. A further informal day of briefings on the OECD work is being held on January 29.

Although Yellen did not attend the IF meeting, she has been busy in her first week holding conversations with finance ministers in France, Germany, the UK and others to discuss cooperation on fiscal matters. Nevertheless, trade tensions are still expected to continue between the US and other countries, especially as countries like Spain push ahead with digital services tax.

In other news, Nigeria’s inaugural Annual National Tax Dialogue meeting in Abuja, organised by the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), brought together regional and national government officials and tax experts to discuss taxation in the post-COVID economy.

The event resulted in the federal government being advised to “explore data and intelligence in order to ease tax collection and improve its revenue base”.

In addition, there have been a number of important tax developments:

Coming up next week

As we enter February next week, there will be a lot to look forward to, including the release of ITR’s 10th edition of the Global Tax 50.

On February 1, there will be a public consultation meeting to discuss the proposals for the 2020 review of the Action 14 minimum standard at the OECD. Consultation responses on the mutual agreement procedure (MAP) were published on January 14 ahead of the public event, which discussed:

  • Experiences with, and views on, the status of dispute resolution and suggestions for improvements, including experiences with MAPs in those jurisdictions that obtained a deferral; and

  • How to strengthen the Action 14 minimum standard and MAP statistics reporting framework.

Mark Martin and Thomas Bettge of KPMG in the US have explored how adopting these proposals could improve dispute resolution in an article published by ITR.

Also on February 1, India’s Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman will present her second annual budget. A lot is expected from the finance minister to support businesses in the post-COVID recovery period, as well as a number of changes to improve the country’s indirect tax regime.

ITR will be providing detailed coverage of the budget announcement, including a webinar with Dhruva Advisors and Taxsutra, as well as articles on how companies are adapting their tax plans in response to the budget.

Meanwhile, ITR will also be examining Uber’s suggestion on how in-house tax policies could help companies align with the UN SDGs and improve on their environmental records.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Italian government published plans to levy capital gains tax on cryptocurrency transactions, while Brazil and the UK signed a new tax treaty.
Multinational companies fear the scrutiny of aggressive tax audits may be overstepping the mark on transfer pricing methodology.
Standardisation and outsourcing are two possible solutions amid increasing regulations and scrutiny on transfer pricing, say sources.
Inaugural awards announces winners
The UN’s decision to seek a leadership role in global tax policy could be a crucial turning point but won’t be the end of the OECD, say tax experts.
The UN may be set to assume a global role in tax policy that would rival the OECD, while automakers lobby the US to change its tax rules on Chinese materials.
Companies including Valentino and EveryMatrix say the early adoption of EU public CbCR rules could boost transparency of local and foreign MNEs, despite the short notice.
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2023 ITR Tax Awards in Asia-Pacific, Europe Middle East & Africa, and the Americas.
Tax authorities and customs are failing multinationals by creating uncertainty with contradictory assessment and guidance, say in-house tax directors.
The CJEU said the General Court erred in law when it ruled that both companies benefitted from Italian state aid.