Luxembourg: A closer look at tax assessments
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Luxembourg: A closer look at tax assessments

Sponsored by


Xavier Sotillos Jaime and Mariana Cohen Margiotta of Deloitte provide an overview of the Grand Duchy’s direct tax framework.

In recent years, Luxembourg has recorded a continued increase in the number of claims filed by corporate taxpayers with respect to direct tax decisions issued by the Luxembourg tax authorities (LTA). Luxembourg’s declarative tax system and swift-paced framework for the assessment of tax returns makes the Grand Duchy’s tax audit process distinct from that of other countries.


This article highlights the stages and time frames of Luxembourg’s direct corporate taxation framework.

Tax returns: Filing and assessment

Luxembourg’s income tax law provides that tax returns should include the amount of income, together with all other information necessary to determine the amount of taxes to be paid. The LTA then issues a tax assessment of the amount of tax payable on income or wealth, or the amount of municipal business tax due.


In principle, tax assessments are issued automatically by the Tax Office section (bureaux d'imposition) of the LTA, based solely on the information provided by the taxpayer in their tax return, and generally within 30 days following the filing process.

A five-year limitation period applies for the LTA to assess, modify, collect, and, if necessary, enforce direct taxes. Therefore, the automated tax assessment may be revisited by the Tax Office during this statute of limitations period before issuing a final assessment.

The Tax Office review process: Information requests and inspections

The Tax Office has the power to request information and additional proof to support the accuracy and completeness of the filed tax return.


Prior to issuing its assessment, the Tax Office should notify the taxpayer in case it intends to disagree with the filed tax return and it should allow the taxpayer to make additional observations/clarifications. The time frame for this exchange is not explicitly stated in the legislative framework. In practice, this period is rather limited—no longer than two or three weeks—and, therefore, the final assessment issued by LTA closely follows the initial notification.

Inspections by the LTA: Service de révision and on-site tax audits

The Tax Office inspector has the power to conduct a tax audit on site or instruct the service de révision to do so. This process involves activities such as the evaluation of accounts/accounting documents and legal agreements, as well as the preparation of audit reports proposing the result for the tax positions assessed.

Burden of proof: Obligations of the taxpayer and the LTA

The taxpayer has to justify and provide evidence to support items reducing their tax base and/or facts releasing them from a tax obligation. Evidence and supporting files for items such as related party transactions and controlled foreign companies should be available upon the LTA’s request.


The burden of proof then falls on the LTA to provide sufficient facts warranting an increase in tax liability.

Contesting a decision issued by the LTA: Pre-litigation and litigation phases

Administrative (pre-litigation) phase

Taxpayers can file an appeal against a decision by the LTA, depending on:

  1. The taxpayer’s understanding of the grounds for its claim;

  2. The nature of the decision that is being contested; and

  3. The administrative rights that the taxpayer wishes to have available in case the LTA issues a negative decision or fails to respond. Further guidance is provided in Luxembourg’s general tax law (Abgabenordnung).

The time frame for filing an appeal is three months as from the reception of the tax assessment, the only exception being informal appeals (recours gracieux), for which the filing deadline is the end of the year following the year of events relating to the claim.

Payment of taxes due

Luxembourg’s procedural framework does not contemplate a payment suspension on account of a claim being filed by the taxpayer. Taxes due become payable in the month following issuance of the LTA’s assessment. However, taxpayers can request a payment suspension from the LTA. In this case, the taxpayer should be in a position to explain their reasoning and to file the relevant appeal prior to requesting a payment suspension. 

Litigation phase: The administrative courts

After the LTA issues its decision or fails to respond within six months, the taxpayer may file a judicial claim before the Administrative Tribunal. Therefore, filing an objection with the director of the LTA is a mandatory preliminary step before filing an appeal before the administrative courts.


The Administrative Tribunal is the court of first instance for a taxpayer’s claim. The taxpayer or the LTA may then appeal the judgment of the Administrative Tribunal to the Administrative Court.


Luxembourg taxpayers would be wise to discern that timing is of essence when addressing requests and tax review processes initiated by the LTA.

An expanded version of this article can be found at Deloitte Luxembourg's website.

Xavier Sotillos Jaime



Mariana Cohen Margiotta



more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Firms with a broad geographic reach are more likely to win work, especially from global companies with high turnovers, according to survey data of nearly 29,000 corporate counsel
Australian businessman Gordon Merchant used EY’s advice to offset an A$85 million capital gain, according to the Federal Court
Griggs has been drafted in ahead of schedule as the incumbent Tim Ryan departs for Citigroup; while the Netherlands plans to scrap a 15% share buyback tax
Authorities must ensure that Russian firms do not use transfer pricing schemes to increase profits made from oil sold in different markets, advocacy organisations have argued
Fallet, a partner at law firm Mauger Muniz Advogados in Brazil, tells ITR about his passion for tax law, the leaders who inspired him, and what makes tax cool
The former chief operating officer will assume the role on July 1
Ahead of next week's Indirect Tax Forum in London, ITR spoke with Christian Van Der Valk of Sovos about how different governments and companies are embracing e-invoicing
Konrad Jeczewski has alleged he was threatened with negative reviews before being made redundant by EY Australia
The suggestion was welcomed by Skadden’s European tax head at a special event on space and tax
A majority of clients – particularly high-earning businesses – want advisers with demonstrable social credentials, according to a survey of more than 28,000 corporate counsel
Gift this article