The VAT exemption modification creates further questions in Chile
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The VAT exemption modification creates further questions in Chile

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-pwc.png
The Chilean IRS will have to provide clarity on the changes

Gregorio Martínez of PwC Chile takes a closer look at the complicated law surrounding VAT exemptions on payments abroad from Chile.

As a general rule, payments from Chile to abroad for services are usually exempted of VAT, as long as certain requirements are met. As reported by PwC Chile in ITR during July 2019, the tax modernisation bill under discussion would bring changes to the VAT exemption applicable on payments to abroad, by modifying the requirements for the exemption to proceed.

According to the rules in force, the exemption to apply requires that the amount is subject to additional tax (Chilean withholding tax) or, in case the payment is not subject to additional tax (due to the application of a legal exemption or due to the application of a double tax treaty), that the service is rendered abroad. Then, services that are rendered in Chile and not levied with additional tax, are therefore subject to VAT, as long it is a VAT levied service.




In this regard, it should be noted that not all services are subject to VAT. Only the services contained in number 3 and 4 of Article 20 of the Chilean Income Tax Law are levied with VAT, among which it can be found: commerce, banks, construction, marketing, television, automatic processing of data, telecommunications, labs, entertainment, etc. 



The modification under discussion would state that, in order to benefit from the exemption, the services must not be rendered nor utilised in Chile. In the previous report, PwC Chile emphasised that this change could affect payments for standardised software to abroad. This briefing analyses other payments that may be affected by the change under discussion.



Understanding the changes



To fully interpret the extent of the above-mentioned modification, it is crucial to be knowledgeable of what the Chilean Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has understood for the place of utilisation of a service.



On this matter, the Chilean IRS has taken the position that a service is deemed to be utilised where the beneficiary of the service is domiciled and where it develops its business (rulings 1484 and 1920 both of 2015 of the Chilean IRS, among others).



One may ask about the appropriateness of the above criterion, particularly since it implies that every time a Chilean taxpayer receives a service from abroad, it must be concluded that the services are utilised in Chile, only due to their domicile, and it doesn't even consider the physical location of the taxpayer at the moment the service is provided, nor where the service is materially used or the purpose of the service.



Then, following the Chilean IRS criterion, we can review some services exempted of additional tax:

  • Commissions, when someone entrust the execution of a business to another, as defined by the Chilean IRS. Whenever an exporter entrusts the sale of their products to a third party, the payment of such service is exempted from additional tax. 

  • International telecommunications.

  • Marketing related to exportation of products or services.


Questions on applicability




With the proposed modifications, all of the examples above are to be considered VAT levied services if the beneficiary has domicile in Chile, since the place of utilisation is bounded to the domicile, according to the Chilean IRS.



Furthermore, income exempted from additional tax due to the application of a double tax treaty may also be affected with VAT, as long as it is a VAT service. That, added to criterion regarding utilisation, provides for interesting cases.



For example, as per the rules described above, if a Chilean taxpayer requests for construction work to be performed in Spain by a Spanish resident, would the payment for the construction service be subject to Chilean VAT considering that the remuneration is to be deemed as a business profit in the context of the Chile-Spain double tax treaty? 



In a similar context, what if the service requested is freight transport performed abroad? - again, delivered by a resident of a country with which Chile has a double tax treaty.



There are several cases still to be reviewed and the full extent of the VAT exemption modification proposed in the tax modernisation bill is still to be fully comprehended. Once the tax bill is passed, there will be important work to be done by the Chilean IRS to provide clarity over the matter to the taxpayers.





Gregorio Martínez

T: +56 2 29400633

E: gregorio.martinez@cl.pwc.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The reported warning follows EY accumulating extra debt to deal with the costs of its failed Project Everest
Law firms that pay close attention to their client relationships are more likely to win repeat work, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Paul Griggs, the firm’s inbound US senior partner, will reverse a move by the incumbent leader; in other news, RSM has announced its new CEO
The EMEA research period is open until May 31
Luis Coronado suggests companies should embrace technology to assist with TP data reporting, as the ‘big four’ firm unveils a TP survey of over 1,000 professionals
The proposed matrix will help revenue officers track intra-company transactions from multinationals
The full list of finalists has been revealed and the winners will be presented on June 20 at the Metropolitan Club in New York
The ‘big four’ firm has threatened to legally pursue those behind the letter, which has been circulating on social media
The guidelines have been established in the wake of multiple tax scandals and controversies that have rocked the accounting profession
KPMG Netherlands’ former head of assurance also received a permanent bar and $150,000 fine; in other news, asset management firm BlackRock lost a $13.5bn UK tax appeal
Gift this article