Treading water

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Treading water

editorial

Achieving transparency, whether as a taxpayer or tax authority, can often feel like you are treading water.

Achieving transparency, whether as a taxpayer or tax authority, can often feel like you are treading water. When it feels like you are getting closer to the shore, another wave of proposals, each with new rules and threats of controversy pushing you out into open water.

Internal procedures, data gathering, analytics, and clear policies all play a key part in achieving transparency. However, transparency initiatives are vulnerable to subjective judgements (page six).

Nevertheless, companies are often accused of pursuing the lowest effective tax rate possible. Many companies are now focused on educating tax authorities, stakeholders and the public to explain how they pay their taxes (page 74). Meanwhile, The B Team has found a framework that it believes could work for many large businesses (page 20).

Many reading this will argue that this is a problem for taxpayers as they aim to comply and protect their business reputation. However, tax authorities are dealing with the same challenges.

Country-by-country reporting (CbCR) and the automatic exchange of information (AEOI) are just two transparency initiatives where it is not entirely clear how governments are analysing and using the data. There are still deep trust issues partly because of this. Furthermore, if tax authorities are viewed as more aggressive and less trustworthy, taxpayers will be ever-more cautious about how open they are with their tax affairs.

It's a vicious circle between taxpayer and tax authorities, but what makes it tougher are tax justice networks fighting for more transparency and fairness. Despite the CbCR and AEOI initiatives being introduced, it's not enough for some non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and they continue to push the debate further (page 40). These networks, while performing an essential service, are not letting taxpayers and governments rest.

No matter what policies are put in place, it seems the water beneath our feet is always getting deeper as NGOs push the boundaries. Many will be trying to stay afloat and avoid getting lost at sea.

Anjana Haines
Managing editor, International Tax Review
anjana.haines@euromoneyplc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In looking at the impact of taxation, money won't always be all there is to it
Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board is set to kick off 2026 with a new secretary to head the administrative side of its regulatory activities.
Ireland’s Department of Finance reported increased income tax, VAT and corporation tax receipts from 2024; in other news, it’s understood that HSBC has agreed to pay the French treasury to settle a tax investigation
The Australian Taxation Office believes the Swedish furniture company has used TP to evade paying tax it owes
Supermarket chain Morrisons is facing a £17 million ($23 million) tax bill; in other news, Donald Trump has cut proposed tariffs
The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
Gift this article