Sweden introduces more stringent rules for deduction of interest

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Sweden introduces more stringent rules for deduction of interest

Nils von Koch of KPMG explains how taxpayers can deal with the stricter approach to deduction of interest in Sweden.

Deductibility of interest

Rules restricting the deductibility of intra-group interest were introduced as of January 1 2009 to make tax planning, by way of interest deductions, more difficult. The Swedish Tax Agency has, ever since, been arguing that the restrictions must be more stringent to avoid a continuing erosion of the Swedish tax base.

More stringent rules restricting the possibilities to deduct interest paid to affiliated companies apply as of January 1 2013. The revised rules can be summarised as follows:

The main rule

The main rule is that intra-group interest is not deductible. Accordingly, the regime covers all debts to affiliated companies. Two exceptions apply to the main rule. These are the 10 % rule and the business reasons test rule.

The 10 % rule

Intra-group interest is deductible under the 10 % rule provided that the rightful recipient (beneficial owner) of the interest income is subject to a tax rate of at least 10 %. The 10 % rule does not apply if the principal reason (approximately 75% or more) for the debt relationship is to obtain a significant tax advantage.

The business reasons test rule

Where the 10 % rule does not apply, companies can revert to the business reasons test rule. The business reasons test rule applies if the debt relationship is made primarily for business reasons. This exception from the main rule applies only where the rightful recipient (beneficial owner) of the interest income is located in a country within the EEA, or in a country with which Sweden has concluded an income tax treaty for the avoidance of double taxation. In assessing whether the business reasons test rule is applicable, consideration must be given to whether funding could instead have been provided through a capital contribution from the company that holds the claim, or from a company that, directly or indirectly, through ownership or otherwise, has a significant influence in the borrowing company.

Back-to-back loans

Interest paid on external back-to-back loans is deductible, unless the loan has been used for the financing of intra-group acquisition of shares.

Affiliated companies

Companies are affiliated if one of them, directly or indirectly, through ownership or otherwise, has a significant influence over the other, or if the companies are under substantially common management.

Corporate tax rate cut

In addition, the corporate tax rate was cut to 22% for financial years beginning after December 31 2012.



Nils von Koch nils.vonkoch@kpmg.se +46 (8) 7239616

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
The firms made senior hires in Los Angeles and Cleveland respectively; in other news, South Korea reported an 11% rise in tax income, fuelled by a corporation tax boom
The ‘deeply flawed’ report is attempting to derail UN tax convention debates, the Tax Justice Network’s CEO said
Salim Rahim, a TP specialist, had been a partner at Baker McKenzie since 2010
While the manual should be consulted for any questions around MAPs, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also emphasised that the guidance is ‘not a political commitment’
The landmark Indian Supreme Court judgment redefines GAAR, JAAR and treaty safeguards, rejects protections for indirect transfers and tightens conditions for Mauritius‑based investors claiming DTAA relief
The expansion introduces ‘business-level digital capabilities’ for tax professionals, the US tax agency said
As tax teams face pressure from complex rules and manual processes, adopting clear ownership, clean data and adaptable technology is essential, writes Russell Gammon, chief innovation officer at Tax Systems
Partners want to join Ryan because it’s a disruptor firm, truly global and less bureaucratic, Tom Shave told ITR
If Trump continues to poke the world’s ‘middle powers’ with a stick, he shouldn’t be surprised when they retaliate
Gift this article