Sweden introduces more stringent rules for deduction of interest

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Sweden introduces more stringent rules for deduction of interest

Nils von Koch of KPMG explains how taxpayers can deal with the stricter approach to deduction of interest in Sweden.

Deductibility of interest

Rules restricting the deductibility of intra-group interest were introduced as of January 1 2009 to make tax planning, by way of interest deductions, more difficult. The Swedish Tax Agency has, ever since, been arguing that the restrictions must be more stringent to avoid a continuing erosion of the Swedish tax base.

More stringent rules restricting the possibilities to deduct interest paid to affiliated companies apply as of January 1 2013. The revised rules can be summarised as follows:

The main rule

The main rule is that intra-group interest is not deductible. Accordingly, the regime covers all debts to affiliated companies. Two exceptions apply to the main rule. These are the 10 % rule and the business reasons test rule.

The 10 % rule

Intra-group interest is deductible under the 10 % rule provided that the rightful recipient (beneficial owner) of the interest income is subject to a tax rate of at least 10 %. The 10 % rule does not apply if the principal reason (approximately 75% or more) for the debt relationship is to obtain a significant tax advantage.

The business reasons test rule

Where the 10 % rule does not apply, companies can revert to the business reasons test rule. The business reasons test rule applies if the debt relationship is made primarily for business reasons. This exception from the main rule applies only where the rightful recipient (beneficial owner) of the interest income is located in a country within the EEA, or in a country with which Sweden has concluded an income tax treaty for the avoidance of double taxation. In assessing whether the business reasons test rule is applicable, consideration must be given to whether funding could instead have been provided through a capital contribution from the company that holds the claim, or from a company that, directly or indirectly, through ownership or otherwise, has a significant influence in the borrowing company.

Back-to-back loans

Interest paid on external back-to-back loans is deductible, unless the loan has been used for the financing of intra-group acquisition of shares.

Affiliated companies

Companies are affiliated if one of them, directly or indirectly, through ownership or otherwise, has a significant influence over the other, or if the companies are under substantially common management.

Corporate tax rate cut

In addition, the corporate tax rate was cut to 22% for financial years beginning after December 31 2012.



Nils von Koch nils.vonkoch@kpmg.se +46 (8) 7239616

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UK’s Labour government has an unpopular prime minister, an unpopular chancellor and not a lot of good options as it prepares to deliver its autumn Budget
Awards
The firms picked up five major awards between them at a gala ceremony held at New York’s prestigious Metropolitan Club
The streaming company’s operating income was $400m below expectations following the dispute; in other news, the OECD has released updates for 25 TP country profiles
Software company Oracle has won the right to have its A$250m dispute with the ATO stayed, paving the way for a mutual agreement procedure
If the US doesn't participate in pillar two then global consensus on the project can’t be a reality, tax academic René Matteotti also suggests
If it gets pillar two right, India may be the ideal country that finds a balance between its global commitments and its national interests, Sameer Sharma argues
As World Tax unveils its much-anticipated rankings for 2026, we focus on EMEA’s top performers in the first of three regional analyses
Firms are spending serious money to expand their tax advisory practices internationally – this proves that the tax practice is no mere sideshow
The controversial deal would ‘preserve the gains achieved under pillar two’, the OECD said; in other news, HMRC outlined its approach to dealing with ‘harmful’ tax advisers
Former EY and Deloitte tax specialists will staff the new operation, which provides the firm with new offices in Tokyo and Osaka
Gift this article