German reforms force mutual fund rethink

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

German reforms force mutual fund rethink

Germany’s 1999 tax reform act, enacted by the legislature on March 19 1999, contains numerous changes to the taxation of domestic and registered foreign mutual funds. These amendments affect both investors and the mutual funds themselves. This article highlights the tax implications of the new law for foreign investment funds held by German investors.

Capital gains arising on disposal of shares in mutual funds

Previously, capital gains derived from securities transactions were exempt from individual income tax if the individual held the securities for at least six months. The new law extends the holding period to one year. Consequently, profits realized by an individual investor on the disposal or redemption of shares in a foreign mutual fund are tax-exempt if the shares have been held for a period exceeding 12 months. However, the German tax authorities have indicated that capital gains derived from interest and related income earned by mutual funds (so-called interim profits) remain taxable. Interim profits must be calculated and published by the mutual fund on a daily basis.

The draft proposal of the new law imposed a one-year holding period for mutual fund distributions to individual investors when those distributions were paid out of capital gains derived from the sale of shares by the fund. The final version of the law does not impose a holding period on mutual funds.

Hence, capital gains from securities transactions realized by foreign mutual funds remain tax-exempt regardless of the length of time the mutual fund has held the securities (provided such securities do not qualify as financial derivatives).

Financial derivatives

While profits from individuals' direct investments in financial derivatives previously were not taxable, the new law taxes these profits if the financial derivatives are held for less than 12 months. The same rule has been introduced into the law regulating foreign mutual funds (the Auslandinvestmentgesetz). Thus, profits from financial derivatives transactions entered into by foreign mutual funds are taxable if the funds have held the derivatives for less than a year.

Although the new law does not specifically define the term 'financial derivatives,' it clearly includes futures, swaps, options, and securities that commercially resemble financial derivatives (eg warranties).

In principle, the new law also applies to financial derivatives used for hedging purposes. Profits realized from a hedge relying on financial derivatives are taxable and may not be offset against a potential loss incurred in the long position in securities that is hedged by the financial derivatives transaction.

The definition of interim profits (generally viewed as including a mutual fund's interest income, realized and accrued on a daily basis) has been extended to include profits derived from financial derivatives transactions with a holding period of less than 12 months. Interim profits are realized by the investor on its disposal or redemption of shares in a foreign investment fund.

Effective date

All provisions of the German tax reform generally are effective retroactively as of January 1 1999. However, the provisions dealing with profits derived from financial derivatives transactions (ie taxation of capital gains, inclusion into interim profits) are effective for transactions entered into after March 31 1999. Financial derivatives already outstanding on March 31 1999 remain subject to the old law even if the profits from those transactions are realized thereafter.

In addition to the provisions that specifically address the taxation of German investors in foreign investment funds, the following changes also generally affect investments in capital markets:

l The income tax rate in the highest tax bracket for individual investors will be reduced from 53% to 51% as of January 1 2000, and to 48.5% as of January 1 2002.

l Under the old law, German corporations were subject to a corporate tax rate of 30% for distributed earnings and 45% for retained earnings (plus a trade tax and solidarity tax surcharge). As of January 1 1999, the corporate tax for retained earnings has been reduced to 40%. This may affect dividends received by foreign funds from German publicly-traded stock corporations. The new government intends to reduce the corporate tax rate even further next year, possibly resulting in an effective rate of 35%. Such a change, however, is still subject to debate.

Despite the changes wrought by the tax reform act, investments in foreign mutual funds remain attractive for German investors. This applies specifically to funds that invest predominantly in stocks since those funds benefit from the fact that they are not subject to any minimum holding period for tax exempt capital gains (whereas for direct investments investors are now subject to the extended holding period of 12 months for tax-exempt capital gains).

Hans Stamm Raupach &Wollert-Elmendorff/ Deloitte & Touche, Munich

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

HMRC expects advisers to meet ever-higher compliance criteria. After 24 consecutive qualified audit opinions, many will ask whether HMRC should hold itself to the same standards
The purchase of Marosa represents the second major tax tech consolidation this week, raising questions of a broader industry trend
Peru’s approach to TP is increasingly at odds with OECD-style profitability policies, exposing multinational groups to asymmetric tax adjustments
Hany Elnaggar examines how the region's legacy economic substance regimes and the OECD's pillar two framework are converging on the same underlying test
The deals for TP Accurate and Intra Pricing Solutions will enhance Alphatax’s ability to support clients with the full TP lifecycle, the tax tech provider claimed
The DS Advocates partner discusses career reinvention, tax disputes and why advisory and litigation experience should complement one another
Lindsay Clayton’s arrival at Baker McKenzie continues the firm’s storied pursuit of ex-US government lawyers, a strategy reinforced by robust World Tax rankings
Shared transaction semantics, governed data and reusable ERP design may prove the most significant benefits of the UK's move to Peppol
As pillar two reshapes global tax competition, the UK faces a crucial challenge: how to remain attractive to multinationals without sacrificing tax revenues
Pillar two may be raising less than expected, but professor René Matteotti says the regime is still changing multinational tax behaviour
Gift this article