International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Zealand: Government response to BEPS project



Brendan Brown

Greg Neill

The New Zealand government has recently released a report detailing possible reforms to address base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) concerns. The OECD's work on BEPS issues has been well publicised. The next stage in that project is for tax authorities from OECD member countries – such as New Zealand – and participating non-member countries to develop an action plan for addressing BEPS.

The initial advice to the New Zealand government from the Inland Revenue and Treasury was that New Zealand should adopt a three-pronged approach to BEPS concerns:

  • Contributing to the OECD's BEPS project;

  • Reviewing domestic law and prioritising projects that will address BEPS concerns; and

  • Co-ordinating with Australia given its importance as a trading partner.

Reform projects

A recent tax policy report released by the Inland Revenue and the Treasury has provided more detail on reform projects for prioritisation as part of New Zealand's response to BEPS.

The first possible reform project identified is the proposed broadening of the thin capitalisation rules. It is proposed that:

  • The scope of the inbound thin capitalisation rules be broadened to apply to New Zealand companies owned or controlled by a consortium of foreign investors, as well as to New Zealand companies controlled by a single foreign owner; and

  • The rules for calculating limits on the level of debt and deductible interest expenditure allowable to the New Zealand group be tightened.

A second possible project identified relates to withholding taxes, and in particular withholding taxes on interest. It is understood that a possible concern relates to a timing mismatch between when interest expenditure is deductible to the payer, and when withholding tax becomes payable on the interest.

The recent report also foreshadows a possible review of tax arbitrage opportunities arising from cross-border mismatches in the treatment of hybrid instruments or hybrid entities. That review will be based on OECD work that will consider policy developments in other countries.

New Zealand's response to BEPS has so far been measured, reflecting the fact that domestic law already contains provisions limiting opportunities for tax planning, including comprehensive controlled foreign corporation and foreign investment fund regimes and a thin capitalisation and transfer pricing regime.

Furthermore, New Zealand's general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) is now being applied in a broader way than GAARs in most other jurisdictions.

As an example, New Zealand's debt/equity boundary for tax purposes generally follows the legal form of the arrangement, but the GAAR has in some cases been applied to deny interest deductions under hybrid arrangements and shareholder debt, thereby, in effect, denying an interest deduction to a taxpayer that has a business need for the funds borrowed and that has complied with both the thin capitalisation and transfer pricing regimes.

Multinationals doing business in New Zealand therefore need to be aware that the recent more expansive application of the GAAR is a source of particular uncertainty, alongside whatever new measures targeting BEPS may be implemented.

Brendan Brown (

Tel: +64 4 819 7748
Greg Neill (

Tel: +64 9 367 8879

Russell McVeagh


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Bartosz Doroszuk of MDDP offers insights on Poland’s new tax legislation on shifted profits, as the implementation deadline looms nearer.
Four tax specialists preview the UK’s transfer pricing requirements, which come into effect on April 1.
The rise of the QDMTT will likely change how countries compete on tax and transfer pricing policy, but it may not reverse decades of falling corporate tax rates.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the EU’s BEFIT initiative and wider tax reforms in the bloc.
COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.