Why 2012 could be a big year for Australian tax reform

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Why 2012 could be a big year for Australian tax reform

aus.jpg

Corporate tax reform in Australia was expected in 2011, but widespread change did not materialise and the issue looks set to continue in 2012 as the government seeks input on how the system should operate.

The October reform forum, whose attendees included trade unions, business and social groups and academics, as well as federal and state government representatives, was designed to be a place for open debate and policy-proposing, with Deputy Prime Minister and Treasurer Wayne Swan telling International Tax Review in the lead up to that event that:

“People who attend the Tax Forum can raise anything they want and we’re looking forward to a wide-ranging debate, but the Government has been clear all along what we won’t do, such as increasing the GST. The Tax Forum will focus on the broad sweep of topics in the AFTS [Australia’s Future Tax System] review.”

However, the Australian government went into that forum with certain ideas already set in stone, and some issues were not up for discussion, with government claiming separate processes were already underway to deal with them. With past reform proposals having failed to translate into implementation, stakeholders were left unhopeful of an actual overhaul of the system.

Those fears proved correct, and businesses now want a concerted and committed effort from government and policymakers.

“If Australia is to remain competitive, prosperous and productive, the Australian Parliament must be prepared to embark on a 10-year, comprehensive reform of the tax system,” said Jennifer Westacott, chief executive of the Business Council of Australia.

“Tax reform must include: a change in the mix of taxes to reduce our reliance on taxes that discourage investment and savings such as income taxes, and increase our reliance on more stable indirect taxes such as the GST; a more efficient distribution of taxes from the Commonwealth to the states; and the removal of a range of inefficient state taxes that raise relatively little revenue such as stamp duties,” added Westacott.

Reforming the tax treatment of losses is one area in which the Business Tax Working Group – established following the October forum to “look at how our tax system can best help businesses increase productivity and respond to the pressures of a changing economy – is already underway in tackling.

“Reforming the tax treatment of losses may be one way to encourage investment in Australia, particularly in struggling businesses, leading to higher productivity and wages,” said Swan.

The Working Group’s interim report on the tax treatment of losses is available on the Treasury website. Consultation closes on 3 February 2012, and the group’s final report is expected in March.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As recent surveys suggest a disconnect between AI adoption and employee engagement, the big four risk digging themselves into a strategic hole
Almost three-quarters of surveyed tax professionals are concerned about inaccurate AI outputs; in other news, Dentons hired a partner from CMS to lead its Belgian tax team
Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Gift this article