International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia to cut corporate tax rate

wayne-swan.jpg

Wayne Swan, Australia’s Deputy Prime Minister and Treasurer, has released draft legislation to cut the corporate tax rate by one percentage point to 29%.

Swan indicated that the cut is designed to “help Australian businesses right across the economy – including the many businesses that are not in the mining boom fast lane and face challenges such as those flowing from a higher dollar”.

The rate will apply to all companies from 2013-14.

“Cutting the company tax rate will increase productivity, promote broad-based economic growth and encourage more investment and jobs across Australia’s entire economy,” said Swan.

The reduction is being funded by the minerals resource rent tax (MRRT) – a tax on the profits of Australian mining companies, due to commence on July 1, with Swan saying “it is one of the ways the Gillard government is spreading the benefits of the nation’s mineral wealth”.

“The timing is being driven by efforts to get the minerals tax through the parliament, but one percentage point is not enough,” said Jonathon Leek, partner at Corrs Chambers Westgarth – Taxand Australia. “The Henry Review recommended a corporate tax rate of 25% to make Australia internationally competitive. But the government is determined to deliver a budget surplus in 2013 and everything else is taking a back seat to that priority. So there is no further reduction on the horizon.”

Political opponents are not supporting the reduction, though the position of opposition leader Tony Abbott is not clear.

“The opposition is opposing the cut on the basis it is to compensate for a tax rise in the form of the minerals tax which they oppose, but the opposition has also suggested a 1.5% cut, so its position is also unclear,” added Leek.

The Business Council of Australia has said that if the MRRT is to be implemented, then a company tax cut is “essential for the strength of the Australian economy”.

Jock McCormack, partner at DLA Piper, said the move is a sensible ploy by the Gillard government.

“It appears, like the possible rollback of tax losses being proposed, to be an initiative to be seen to be doing something for small business without a significant cost or revenue,” he said.

FURTHER READING:

Gillard’s indirect tax plans still ruffling feathers

Carbon tax continues to inflame Australians

Carbon tax could hit South Africa within a year

Why Australia’s carbon tax will prove ineffective

Why 2012 could be a big year for Australian tax reform

Australian steel company wants government handout over carbon tax

Australia’s mining tax continues to come under fire

Australia’s carbon tax clears final hurdle









more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Two months since EU political agreement on pillar two and few member states have made progress on new national laws, but the arrival of OECD technical guidance should quicken the pace. Ralph Cunningham reports.
It’s one of the great ironies of recent history that a populist Republican may have helped make international tax policy more progressive.
Lawmakers have up to 120 days to decide the future of Brazil’s unique transfer pricing rules, but many taxpayers are wary of radical change.
Shell reports profits of £32.2 billion, prompting calls for higher taxes on energy companies, while the IMF warns Australia to raise taxes to sustain public spending.
Governments now have the final OECD guidance on how to implement the 15% global minimum corporate tax rate.
The Indian company, which is contesting the bill, has a family connection to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak – whose government has just been hit by a tax scandal.
Developments included calls for tax reform in Malaysia and the US, concerns about the level of the VAT threshold in the UK, Ukraine’s preparations for EU accession, and more.
A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.