Australia to cut corporate tax rate

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia to cut corporate tax rate

wayne-swan.jpg

Wayne Swan, Australia’s Deputy Prime Minister and Treasurer, has released draft legislation to cut the corporate tax rate by one percentage point to 29%.

Swan indicated that the cut is designed to “help Australian businesses right across the economy – including the many businesses that are not in the mining boom fast lane and face challenges such as those flowing from a higher dollar”.

The rate will apply to all companies from 2013-14.

“Cutting the company tax rate will increase productivity, promote broad-based economic growth and encourage more investment and jobs across Australia’s entire economy,” said Swan.

The reduction is being funded by the minerals resource rent tax (MRRT) – a tax on the profits of Australian mining companies, due to commence on July 1, with Swan saying “it is one of the ways the Gillard government is spreading the benefits of the nation’s mineral wealth”.

“The timing is being driven by efforts to get the minerals tax through the parliament, but one percentage point is not enough,” said Jonathon Leek, partner at Corrs Chambers Westgarth – Taxand Australia. “The Henry Review recommended a corporate tax rate of 25% to make Australia internationally competitive. But the government is determined to deliver a budget surplus in 2013 and everything else is taking a back seat to that priority. So there is no further reduction on the horizon.”

Political opponents are not supporting the reduction, though the position of opposition leader Tony Abbott is not clear.

“The opposition is opposing the cut on the basis it is to compensate for a tax rise in the form of the minerals tax which they oppose, but the opposition has also suggested a 1.5% cut, so its position is also unclear,” added Leek.

The Business Council of Australia has said that if the MRRT is to be implemented, then a company tax cut is “essential for the strength of the Australian economy”.

Jock McCormack, partner at DLA Piper, said the move is a sensible ploy by the Gillard government.

“It appears, like the possible rollback of tax losses being proposed, to be an initiative to be seen to be doing something for small business without a significant cost or revenue,” he said.

FURTHER READING:

Gillard’s indirect tax plans still ruffling feathers

Carbon tax continues to inflame Australians

Carbon tax could hit South Africa within a year

Why Australia’s carbon tax will prove ineffective

Why 2012 could be a big year for Australian tax reform

Australian steel company wants government handout over carbon tax

Australia’s mining tax continues to come under fire

Australia’s carbon tax clears final hurdle






more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Kingsley Napley’s claimants are arguing that taxing the provision of education breaches the European Convention on Human Rights
While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Cultural nuances could account for tax advisers’ perceived poor cost management, a local partner told ITR
Updated rules represent a significant shift in the Luxembourg TP landscape and emphasise the need for robust arm’s-length calculations, says Vanessa Ramos Ferrin of TransFair Pricing Solutions
Gift this article