Australia announces crackdown on tax advice misconduct after PwC scandal

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia announces crackdown on tax advice misconduct after PwC scandal

MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA - JULY 30, 2018: PwC headquarters building

The Labor government has committed to tougher regulation of tax advice and more powers for watchdogs over the Australian tax system.

Australia is set for its biggest crackdown on tax advice misconduct, according to a Treasury statement yesterday, August 6.

Treasurer Jim Chalmers announced a government-wide response in the joint statement signed by Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus, Assistant Treasurer Stephen Jones and Minister for Finance Katy Gallagher.

“The PwC scandal exposed severe shortcomings in our regulatory frameworks that were largely ignored by the coalition,” Chalmers said in the joint statement. “We’re cracking down on misconduct to rebuild people’s faith in the systems and structures that keep our tax system and capital markets strong.

“We’re also cracking down on the scourge of multinational tax avoidance and making sure multinationals pay their fair share of tax in Australia,” he added.

The joint statement listed three focus points for reform: 1) strengthening the integrity of the tax system, 2) increasing the powers of regulators, and 3) ensuring the regulatory framework is fit for purpose.

“Tax agents and others who advise their clients to avoid Australia’s tax laws must be penalised,” said Chalmers in the joint statement. “Bigger penalties will reduce incentives to use confidential government information to help clients avoid tax.”

Meanwhile, executives at the ‘big four’ firms Deloitte, EY, PwC and KPMG have told the Australian Financial Review that they want to see a single set of standards for their industry.

Just the start

PwC Australia is conducting an internal review, while the firm and former employees face investigations. These include two Senate committee inquiries and a criminal investigation by the Australian Federal Police into the conduct of Peter-John Collins, the former PwC partner implicated in the leaks.

“The PwC scandal has shown some regulatory frameworks are not fit for purpose,” said Chalmers in the joint statement. “It has raised questions about the adequacy of regulations applying to large consulting, accounting and auditing firms.

“This includes whether there are appropriate governance obligations on these firms,” he added.

The Labor government has already introduced legislation to strengthen the Tax Practitioners Board (TPB), including a A$30 million ($19.7 million) boost in funding to raise compliance levels.

At the same time, the government has moved to limit the role of PwC in public sector contracts, particularly to exclude anyone connected to the tax leaks.

The Treasury has now laid out a roadmap for building on these changes.

For example, the government will raise the maximum penalty for promoting abusive tax schemes from A$7.8 million to over A$780 million as a deterrent to advisory firms.

Meanwhile, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) will get more time to take a tax matter to the Federal Court – from four years to six years following the incident of alleged misconduct.

As part of the reforms, the ATO and the TPB will be able to refer ethical misconduct by advisers to professional associations for disciplinary action. The TPB will gain more time – up to two years – to carry out difficult investigations, while its public register of practitioners will be made more transparent.

The Treasury also wants to remove the limits on tax secrecy laws that blocked regulators from taking swifter action against PwC Australia over the tax leaks. Whistleblowers will gain more protection for the evidence they provide to the TPB.

A review will be launched into whether legal professional privilege has been used to obstruct investigations into misconduct. This could mean the government will later change the law regarding such client privileges on the grounds of public interest.

The Labor government will work to deliver regulatory changes over the next two years with a consultation held in the coming months. This will focus on key issues such as the sanctions available to the TPB.

There will be a series of reviews as part of this process. The Treasury will assess the penalties for the promoters of abusive tax schemes, as well as new forms of fraud and systemic abuse of the tax system by advisers.

The Finance Department will review the use of confidentiality arrangements across all government agencies to ensure they are enforceable as well as legally binding. It will also examine ways to minimise and eliminate conflicts of interest.

ITR has produced a timeline on the tax leads scandal. You can read it here.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In looking at the impact of taxation, money won't always be all there is to it
Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board is set to kick off 2026 with a new secretary to head the administrative side of its regulatory activities.
Ireland’s Department of Finance reported increased income tax, VAT and corporation tax receipts from 2024; in other news, it’s understood that HSBC has agreed to pay the French treasury to settle a tax investigation
The Australian Taxation Office believes the Swedish furniture company has used TP to evade paying tax it owes
Supermarket chain Morrisons is facing a £17 million ($23 million) tax bill; in other news, Donald Trump has cut proposed tariffs
The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
Gift this article