Transfer pricing practitioners can’t claim ignorance over PwC scandal, says Australian senator

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Transfer pricing practitioners can’t claim ignorance over PwC scandal, says Australian senator

Senator O'Neill.jpg

Speaking exclusively to ITR, Senator Deborah O’Neill said it’s unlikely that multinationals that restructured their TP were unaware that the advice they received was confidential.

Deborah O’Neill, Labor senator for New South Wales and chair of the Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, has said it’s hard to believe claims of innocence from transfer pricing practitioners connected to the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal.

Uber and Facebook are two firms that have been caught up in the scandal after they managed to restructure and sidestep Australian anti-tax avoidance legislation days before it came into effect in January 2016.

They were able to do this after receiving confidential government information that was leaked by the former head of international tax at PwC Australia, Peter-John Collins, who was part of an advisory group consulting with the Treasury on plans for new legislation.

Uber reportedly moved its Australian business to three partnerships registered in the Netherlands, in a restructuring devised by PwC, its tax adviser at the time. The firm ended its relationship with PwC Australia in September, according to a spokesperson.

Neither Uber nor Facebook has faced a penalty, largely because they both claim that they had no knowledge that the information was improperly obtained.

But, in an exclusive interview with ITR, Senator O’Neill said the explanation is hard to believe based on the sophistication of the TP practitioners at these large multinationals.

“An argument that was put to us is that there’s no way they would have put money on the line if they weren’t quite confident that the intelligence they had was accurate,” she said.

“It is pretty unlikely that people savvy enough to set up transfer pricing tax regimes would be not savvy enough to demand some clarification and assurance that this scheme was actually going to be enacted, which means that they would know that there was confidential information,” she added.

O’Neill continues to lead an inquiry into PwC, other tax consultancies, and the companies on the receiving end of the leaked information.

She insisted that while the government needs to “chase down” the large tech companies that benefitted from the information, the outcome remains uncertain.

The full interview with O’Neill, in which she also discusses more on the tax leaks scandal, the wider consultancy sector, and the future safeguarding of Australian public procurement, will be published on ITR in the coming days.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The recently formed firm has taken a break from hiring EY talent to expand its transactional tax and tax technology capabilities
The AI platform, founded last year by two school friends, is partnering with challenger firms like Unity Advisory and A&M Tax to launch its own assault on the AI tax market
Not only has Aurtus received recognition from ITR in the past, but its founder was both a partner at KPMG and co-founder of Dhruva Advisors
Clients care more about considered counsel than rapid media-friendly soundbites, says Matthew Gilleard, associate director at Infinite
It was also a memorable night for Galicia, KPMG, Skadden and Pinheiro Neto, all of which scooped major awards at a gala ceremony in New York
The former Deloitte UK CEO earned a 45% raise in a year when 1,000 staff reportedly lost their jobs – and the pay gap is only getting bigger
In a seminal development for big law, the 95-year-old firm is set to cease operations after a series of high-profile partner departures
UK Chancellor John Healey extended a VAT cut, suspended tariffs, increased a bank surcharge and vowed to increase funding for HMRC
Kristine Riisberg warned that TP decisions can determine top-up tax exposure under pillar two, while global consensus over the rules remains unsettled
Both Germany’s NIS2 and the EU AI Act now determine whether a tax function can meet its obligations – and both can make management personally accountable
Gift this article