Deloitte Australia admits misuse of information as PwC scandal widens

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Deloitte Australia admits misuse of information as PwC scandal widens

Gdansk, Poland - May 8, 2022: Logo and sign of Deloitte, multina

Another ‘big four’ firm has been dragged into claims of impropriety as a Senate inquiry into consulting services continues.

Deloitte Australia has told the Senate it misused information from the Australian government last year, but the firm refused to provide more details owing to concerns over client confidentiality.

The firm maintained, however, that the confidential information was not misused for commercial gain.

“Any matters in relation to the misuse of confidential government information would be investigated in line with our normal processes,” said Deloitte in the Friday, July 14, Senate hearing on consulting services.

“Consequences would vary depending on the findings of our internal investigations and, as with any misconduct, these consequences include disciplinary actions in accordance with our policies, which apply to both partners and employees,” the firm told the Senate committee.

The Senate investigation into consulting services comes amid the ongoing PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, in which former partner Peter-John Collins was found to have shared confidential government information with colleagues and clients.

Deloitte Australia also confirmed there was misuse of confidential or proprietary information on nine occasions in FY2021/22, but that this was down from 18 times the previous financial year.

At the hearing, Deloitte Australia also provided the Senate with details about two cases of conflicts of interests involving government contracts. This included work with the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) and the Home Affairs Department.

“It was identified in August 2022 that Deloitte had not sought pre-approval from the ANAO to provide the service, as required under their independence and conflicts management policies,” the firm told the Senate.

Deloitte acknowledged that the Home Affairs Department terminated a contract with the firm over an undisclosed conflict of interest. However, the firm told the Senate it was not aware of any other “significant conflict-of-interest matters relating to government work”.

The Senate inquiry will hear from consultancy Accenture and big four firm EY Australia next as the two-day hearing continues until tomorrow, July 18. Meanwhile, management consultancy firm McKinsey has declined to appear before the committee.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and US President Donald Trump have agreed that the countries will look to conclude a deal by July 21, 2025
The firm’s lack of transparency regarding its tax leaks scandal should see the ban extended beyond June 30, senators Deborah O’Neill and Barbara Pocock tell ITR
Despite posing significant administrative hurdles, digital services taxes remain ‘the best way forward’ for emerging economies, says Neil Kelley, COO of Ascoria
A ‘joint understanding’ among G7 countries that ‘defends American interests’ is set to be announced, Scott Bessent claimed
The ‘big four’ firm’s inaugural annual report unveiled a sharp drop in profits for 2024; in other news, Baker McKenzie and Perkins Coie expanded their US tax benches
Representatives from the two countries focused on TP as they met this week to evaluate progress under a previously signed agreement – it is understood
The UK accountancy firm’s transfer pricing lead tells ITR about his expat lifestyle, taking risks, and what makes tax cool
Dolphin Drilling intends to discuss the final liability amount and manner of settlement with HM Revenue and Customs
Winning the case against the 20% VAT imposition was always going to be an uphill challenge for the claimants, UK tax advisers argue
A ‘paradigm shift’ in Chile’s tax enforcement requires compliance architecture built on proactive governance, strategic documentation and active monitoring of judicial developments
Gift this article