Mexico ratifies tax treaty protocol with Austria

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico ratifies tax treaty protocol with Austria

cuellar.jpg
amaral.jpg

David Cuellar

 

Fernanda Amaral

In February 2010, the Mexican Senate ratified a protocol amending the existing 2004 Convention for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Austria with respect to taxes on income and capital.

The protocol was signed on September 18 2009 and will enter into force three months following compliance with the ratification instruments between Mexico and Austria. This treaty will become applicable as of January 1 in the year after all the requirements are met, which may be 2011.

Historically the exchange of information has been conceived as a mechanism or technique against fraud and international fiscal evasion. The fact that a double tax treaty includes specific provisions in this respect follows a legal trend where tax-related information can be exchanged between tax authorities.

The tax secrecy regulations of the information exchange provisions refer to persons who are allowed access to them and what can be done with them. Their aim is to avoid the incorrect disclosure of information and its misuse for anything other than its real purpose.

The main provision of this protocol is that the competent authorities of the two jurisdictions shall exchange information relevant for either: a) carrying out the provisions of the tax treaty or b) the administration or enforcement of the domestic laws concerning taxes of every kind imposed on behalf of these jurisdictions.

Also, the protocol allows exchange of information notwithstanding if it is in possession of a bank, other financial institution, agent or any other person acting as a representative. This protocol does not consider that the exchange of information would be in an autonomous or spontaneous way.

The exchange of information will be performed via a formal request which shall be grounded, fulfilling certain requirements and establishing the purposes for which the information should be used, avoiding fishing expeditions.

David Cuellar (david.cuellar@mx.pwc.com) & Fernanda Amaral Vicentini (fernanda.amaral.vicentini@mx.pwc.com), Mexico City

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
Gift this article