India and Korea: New memorandum suspends tax collection during MAP

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


India and Korea: New memorandum suspends tax collection during MAP

India and South Korea have signed a new MoU [memorandum of understanding] tax treaty on December 9 to strengthen the ease of doing business in each country.

The signing took place at a meeting of Indian and Korean delegations, headed by the revenue secretary and the commissioner, hosted by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Park Geun-hye in South Korea.

Sagar Wagh, senior consultant at EY in New Delhi, welcomed the revised agreement.

“Entering into the MoU to revise the tax treaty demonstrates the commitment from both countries to move towards proactive dispute resolution, remove double taxation and encourage cross-border investments,” said Wagh.

“This will encourage more taxpayers to opt for the MAP [mutual agreement procedure] route, as the MoU will provide assured savings in immediate cash outflow, which is a major concern of the taxpayers post-receiving the tax audit order and demand from revenue authorities.”

The MoU will reduce the likelihood of double taxation for taxpayers in both countries by suspending the collection of taxes if MAP proceedings are still pending.

A joint statement from the meeting said: “The two sides hoped for increased exchange of India-Korea parliamentary delegations. They shared the view that the exchange of India-Korea parliamentary delegations will contribute towards greater interaction and understanding between the two parliaments.”

Transfer pricing cases

Despite a press statement confirming both countries have agreed that transfer pricing dispute cases will be taken up for MAP under the revised treaty, Wagh believes that there is still not a clear provision for the corresponding adjustment of transfer pricing cases under “article 9(2) as per model convention”.

“The Indian tax administration does not admit MAP cases under the India-Korea tax treaty involving transfer pricing disputes,” said Wagh. “This position will remain the same even after signing of this MoU.”



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Death, taxes and Deloitte hoovering up trophies at an ITR awards night. Isn’t that the saying?
AI, pillar two and joint audits could define the next era of tax controversy, says Baker McKenzie tax partner Ariane Calloud
Gregor McMillan of Howden explains how insurance-backed financing can help businesses and funds unlock liquidity from tax receivables and other contingent claims
The arrival of Alex Anderson swiftly follows that of funds tax specialist Stuart Alter and suggests the Tier 3-ranked firm has higher ambitions
One of the two appointments is EY’s Gordon McIntosh, who becomes the big four firm’s second senior tax departure in September
Balson's move from a Tier 1 practice to a Tier 3 competitor looks counterintuitive. The market data suggests it is anything but
Awards
It was another banner year for Deloitte, which picked up more awards than any other firm at a gala ceremony held at The Londoner in Leicester Square
The big four firm has been embroiled in a scandal over partners’ misuse of confidential board papers to pitch for and win corporate audits for Westpac and Dexus
Drawing on lessons from the PepsiCo case, tax lawyer Paul McNab explains why the ATO's latest royalty guidance should concern multinationals well beyond the technology sector
As pillar two exposes the limits of fragmented tax processes, organisations are rethinking their operating models to create the trusted data foundations that AI demands
Gift this article