International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Global Tax 50 2016: Margrethe Vestager

Competition commissioner, European Commission

Margrethe Vestager

Margrethe Vestager was also in the Global Tax 50 2015, 2014, and 2013 

The EU competition commissioner has had a busy year scrutinising the tax affairs of multinational enterprises and member states. She tops this year's Global Tax 50 list for her most notable decision concerning Apple's tax rulings with Ireland.

The case, where Vestager said that Ireland had granted illegal tax benefits to Apple and ordered the company to pay €13 billion ($14.5 billion) in back taxes, sparked a major discussion around the topic of fair taxation. It also led to outbursts by US politicians who accused Vestager of preying on US multinationals in a number of state aid cases spanning the past two years.

Both Apple and Ireland are appealing the order to pay back taxes. Apple CEO Tim Cook called the decision "total political crap" and said "they just picked a number from I don't know where".

"It is 100% legitimate to tax profit where it is generated. From our perspective, it is irritating when American companies pay less in taxes than European ones," Vestager told Germany's Handelsblatt newspaper after announcing the Apple decision.

State aid issues have been a big talking point throughout 2016, and Apple was not the only company that had its operations investigated by the European Commission. Over the past year, the former Danish economy minister also looked into Luxembourg's tax treatment of Amazon, GDF Suez (now Engie) and McDonald's, among other cases. Some of these companies are still under investigation and a decision is pending.

Vestager has been targeting illegal state aid involving tax rulings since the beginning on the year. On January 11 2016, she started by declaring that the Belgian 'excess profits' tax scheme was illegal under EU state aid rules. The practice reduced the corporate tax base of several multinational groups by between 50% and 90% to discount for so-called "excess profits" that allegedly resulted from being part of a multinational group. The arrangement had been in place since 2005 and at least 35 multinational groups benefited, mainly from the EU, on the basis of a binding tax ruling. Vestager said that the scheme allowed companies to pay substantially less tax simply because they were a multinational business. Belgium was ordered to reclaim around €700 million ($781 million) in unpaid taxes from the multinationals. However, the matter did not end there. Chemical manufacturer BASF and other multinational companies have taken the case to court, accusing the Commission of exerting an "excess of power" and unfairly using state aid rules to prohibit the excess profits system. The case will continue into 2017.

Throughout 2016, several high-profile politicians and business leaders have voiced their concerns that the Commission seems to be applying the state aid concept every time it sees that profit is going un-taxed and that this is not actually what the state aid rules are for. The argument is that state aid is meant to be used in situations where one jurisdiction grants tax or other benefits that depart from the jurisdiction's normal reference system. Vestager's predecessor Neelie Kroes also attacked the Commission's decision in the Apple case for this reason, and said that state aid rules should not apply to tax matters. "EU member states have a sovereign right to determine their own tax laws. State aid cannot be used to rewrite those rules, however, the current state aid investigations into tax rulings appear to do exactly that," Kroes wrote in the Guardian newspaper.

Nevertheless, Vestager has the ability to shape the reputation and image of the Competition Commission, and she has left her mark on the institution like none of her predecessors. Vestager has made it her mission to ensure that the tiniest of companies can stand a chance against their bigger counterparts, and whether the rest of the tax world agrees with Vestager or not, she has undeniably put fair taxation higher up on the agenda and left some multinationals trembling with the fear that they may be next on Vestager's list of investigations.

The Global Tax 50 2016

View the full list and introduction

The top 10 • Ranked in order of influence

1. Margrethe Vestager

2. The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists

3. Brexit

4. Arun Jaitley

5. Jacob Lew

6. Antoine Deltour and Raphaël Halet

7. Operation Zealots

8. Guy Verhofstadt

9. Theresa May (and the 'three Brexiteers')

10. Donald Trump

The remaining 40 • In alphabetic order

Kemi Adeosun

Piet Battiau

Elise Bean

Monica Bhatia

Allison Christians

Tim Cook

Rita de la Feria

Caroline Flint

Judith Freedman

Chrystia Freeland

Pravin Gordhan

Orrin Hatch

Meg Hillier

Mulyani Indrawati

Lou Jiwei

Paul Johnson

Stephanie Johnston

Chris Jordan

Pravind Jugnauth

Wang Jun

Jean-Claude Juncker

Kathleen Kerrigan

Christine Lagarde

Werner Langen

Jolyon Maugham

Angela Merkel

Narendra Modi

Will Morris

Michael Noonan

Grace Perez-Navarro

Platform for the Collaboration on Tax

Donato Raponi

Pascal Saint-Amans

Heather Self

Robert Stack

Tax Justice Network

The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)

Transparency International

US Committee on Ways and Means

Rodrigo Valdés

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Developments included the end of Saudi Arabia’s tax amnesty, Poland’s VAT battle with the EU, the Indirect Tax Forum, India’s WTO complaint, and more.
Charlotte Sallabank and Christy Wilson of Katten UK look at the Premier League's use of 'dual representation' contracts for tax matters.
Shareholders are set to vote on whether the asset management firm will adopt public CbCR, amid claims of tax avoidance.
US lawmakers averted a default on debt by approving the Fiscal Responsibility Act, but this deal may consolidate the Biden tax reforms rather than undermine them.
In a letter to the Australian Senate, the firm has provided the names of all 67 staff who received confidential emails but has not released them publicly.
David Pickstone and Anastasia Nourescu of Stewarts review the facts and implications of Ørsted’s appeal at the Upper Tribunal.
The Internal Revenue Service will lose the funding as part of the US debt limit deal, while Amazon UK reaps the benefits of the 130% ‘super-deduction’.
The European Commission wanted to make an example of US companies like Apple, but its crusade against ‘sweetheart’ tax rulings may be derailed at the CJEU.
The OECD has announced that a TP training programme is about to conclude in West Africa, a region that has been plagued by mispricing activities for a number of years.
Richard Murphy and Andrew Baker make the case for tax transparency as a public good and how key principles should lead to a better tax system.