Global Tax 50 2016: Brexit

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Global Tax 50 2016: Brexit

Geopolitical event that has created unprecedented tax uncertainty

 Brexit

Brexit is a new entry this year

The narrow vote by the people of the UK to leave the European Union in a referendum on June 23 took the world – and much of the UK itself – by surprise.

The decision has set the backdrop for the most complex set of negotiations in legal history. It took Greenland three years to exit the EU – a year longer than the UK will have to navigate its exit once Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty is triggered – and most of the disputes of note in those negotiations concerned fishing.

Most people in the tax sphere hoped that Brexit would not happen because leaving the EU brings with it an almost innumerable host of questions.

It throws into question huge amounts of UK legislation, and the uncertainty this brings is one of the most potentially damaging issues a business may be forced to deal with. Worldwide, 41% of businesses are still waiting for further clarity on Brexit before assessing its broader impact, according to a recent joint survey by International Tax Review and KPMG.

Other questions that remain unanswered – and may remain unclear in 2017 – include: Will the UK retain access to the European single market, or will tariffs be placed on imports and exports? Which industries will be affected? What will happen with customs? And excise? Will the UK continue to follow the EU's VAT Directive? How will case law from the European Court of Justice apply? Could the UK stay under its jurisdiction? If not, what about cases that are still underway at the time the UK leaves? Will the UK have to adhere to the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive? What will happen to information exchange with EU countries?

While International Tax Review has written several articles on Brexit so far, the key word continues to be "uncertainty". This uncertainty, however, is not limited to the UK and EU – it has also had far-reaching consequences around the world.

"The withdrawal of the UK from the EU constitutes an event that will wield a substantial impact not only on the future of European integration but also on the international community as a whole, which is why the world including Asia is paying close attention to the Brexit negotiations," said an open letter written by the Japanese government to the UK in the aftermath of the referendum result.

The letter went on to make several requests of the UK and EU, including the preservation of pre-Brexit tariff rates and customs clearance procedures and of the 'single passport' system, which is incredibly valuable for companies in the financial sector.

Despite the uncertainty, some tax conclusions can be drawn from developments since the referendum vote.

The UK will continue to take part in the BEPS Project

The UK has been a major proponent of the OECD's Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS). There is no indication that this trend will be broken. Indeed, the UK surprised many when it became the first nation to include public country-by-country reporting provisions in its laws.

Crucially, as an indicator of post-Brexit policy, this legislative change happened after the referendum, when the 2016 Finance Bill (in which the power to switch on the requirement for public disclosure of tax filings was included) was unanimously approved by the House of Commons on September 5.

Since then, Chancellor of the Exchequer Philip Hammond has doubled down on the UK's public commitment to tackling tax evasion, avoidance and aggressive tax planning, and has stressed that the UK tax gap is "now one of the lowest in the world".

However, the UK government has remained silent on whether it plans to apply pressure on its overseas territories – where a significant proportion of the world's tax planning takes place – to become more transparent.

The UK will remain an attractive place to do business

The government knows that it has to work hard to keep jobs in the UK, particularly if it were to fall into recession after exiting the EU. The country that gave the world patent boxes is more than capable of creating more quirks in the tax system to keep companies onside.

Already, it has given assurances to car manufacturers, leading to further UK investment and increasing production – though what these assurances were remain a mystery.

The UK's corporate tax rate will continue to fall

Since the Conservative Party took power in 2010, at first in coalition with the Liberal Democrats and then as the majority party in 2015, UK corporate tax has fallen from 28% to 20%.

In the immediate aftermath of the Brexit vote, then-Chancellor George Osborne – a former Global Tax 50 entrant – put corporate tax cuts at the heart of his strategy to keep Britain competitive post-Brexit, setting out plans to bring the rate down to 15%.

Hammond, his successor, confirmed in the Autumn Statement in November that the corporate tax rate will continue to fall, in line with Osborne's pre-Brexit plans, to 17% by 2020. However, no radical corporate tax cuts to 15% were announced.

In 2017, Brexit will remain an important development to watch. Prime Minister Theresa May plans to trigger Article 50 in March, which will allow the UK and EU to begin negotiating the UK's exit. What this agreement holds will not come quickly enough for the many businesses trying to plan for the change.

The Global Tax 50 2016

View the full list and introduction

The top 10 • Ranked in order of influence

1. Margrethe Vestager

2. The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists

3. Brexit

4. Arun Jaitley

5. Jacob Lew

6. Antoine Deltour and Raphaël Halet

7. Operation Zealots

8. Guy Verhofstadt

9. Theresa May (and the 'three Brexiteers')

10. Donald Trump

The remaining 40 • In alphabetic order

Kemi Adeosun

Piet Battiau

Elise Bean

Monica Bhatia

Allison Christians

Tim Cook

Rita de la Feria

Caroline Flint

Judith Freedman

Chrystia Freeland

Pravin Gordhan

Orrin Hatch

Meg Hillier

Mulyani Indrawati

Lou Jiwei

Paul Johnson

Stephanie Johnston

Chris Jordan

Pravind Jugnauth

Wang Jun

Jean-Claude Juncker

Kathleen Kerrigan

Christine Lagarde

Werner Langen

Jolyon Maugham

Angela Merkel

Narendra Modi

Will Morris

Michael Noonan

Grace Perez-Navarro

Platform for the Collaboration on Tax

Donato Raponi

Pascal Saint-Amans

Heather Self

Robert Stack

Tax Justice Network

The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)

Transparency International

US Committee on Ways and Means

Rodrigo Valdés

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Hotel La Tour had argued that VAT should be recoverable as a result of proceeds being used for a taxable business activity
Tax professionals are still going to be needed, but AI will make it easier than starting from zero, EY’s global tax disputes leader Luis Coronado tells ITR
AI and assisting clients with navigating global tax reform contributed to the uptick in turnover, the firm said
In a post on X, Scott Bessent urged dissenting countries to the US/OECD side-by-side arrangement to ‘join the consensus’ to get a deal over the line
A new transatlantic firm under the name of Winston Taylor is expected to go live in May 2026 with more than 1,400 lawyers and 20 offices
As ITR’s exclusive data uncovers in-house dissatisfaction with case management, advisers cite Italy’s arcane tax rules
The new guidance is not meant to reflect a substantial change to UK law, but the requirement that tax advice is ‘likely to be correct’ imposes unrealistic expectations
Gift this article