Global Tax 50 2016: Michael Noonan

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Global Tax 50 2016: Michael Noonan

Minister for finance, Ireland

Michael Noonan

Michael Noonan was also in the Global Tax 50 2014, 2013, and 2011

While most finance ministers would be happy to collect €13 billion ($14.5 billion) in taxes from a multinational company, Michael Noonan is not one of them. The Apple case was one of 2016's biggest tax-related dispute and it received even more attention after Ireland said it "disagreed profoundly" with the European Commission's decision that Apple had received illegal tax benefits and should pay billions in back taxes to Ireland.

After the European Commission's attack on the "double Irish" in 2014, a strategy used by many multinationals to lower their European tax bills, the Apple decision was a big blow to the country, which has the lowest corporate tax rate among EU member nations at 12.5%.

"The key issue is to defend our right as an independent country with control over our tax system and how it is applied by Revenue and Revenue is adamant there was no selective treatment," Michael McGrath, finance spokesperson for the Fianna Fáil party told Irish broadcaster RTE after the Apple decision was announced. Noonan added that it was "necessary to defend the integrity of our tax system; to provide tax certainty to business; and to challenge the encroachment of EU state aid rules into the sovereign member state competence of taxation".

"Defend" is exactly what Noonan intends to do. After gaining approval from the Irish parliament to appeal the Commission's state aid decision, an appeal was filed in the European Courts on November 9. "The government has decided unanimously to bring an appeal before the European Courts to challenge the European Commission's decision on the Apple State aid case," Noonan said. "I believe that there are some very important principles at stake in this case and that a robust legal challenge before the Courts is essential to defend Ireland's interests. The full amount of tax was paid in this case and no state aid was provided. Ireland did not give favourable tax treatment to Apple. Ireland does not do deals with taxpayers."

Speaking on Bloomberg TV, Noonan said there are two phases to the appeal: the ordinary European court and then the European Court of Justice. "It will probably take four years, probably more."

In addition to this, in this year's budget Noonan announced that he would reduce the burden on taxpayers by just under €300 million ($330.2 million). He also published an update on the government's international tax strategy to highlight the progress made over the past year and how the country's corporate tax regime "meets the highest standards in tax transparency" in the wake of recent issues. However, finance minister remained firm that Ireland's very low corporate tax rate of 12.5% would not be changed, stating that "nobody is asking for it to be changed".

Separately, he also submitted proposals to parliament on September 6, amending Ireland's Section 110 tax regime to charge a potential 25% tax on future profits arising for overseas investors in Irish loan portfolios.

The budget, additional tax changes, and the controversial Apple case, secured Noonan a place in this year's Global Tax 50.

Undoubtedly, 2017 will be a crucial year for Noonan and his government. Defending Ireland's tax system and its attractiveness to multinational enterprises worldwide will take priority when the court case against the Commission's Apple decision is heard. Noonan has used many opportunities to defend the tax system, but the battle will only get tougher in the year ahead.

The Global Tax 50 2016

View the full list and introduction

The top 10 • Ranked in order of influence

1. Margrethe Vestager

2. The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists

3. Brexit

4. Arun Jaitley

5. Jacob Lew

6. Antoine Deltour and Raphaël Halet

7. Operation Zealots

8. Guy Verhofstadt

9. Theresa May (and the 'three Brexiteers')

10. Donald Trump

The remaining 40 • In alphabetic order

Kemi Adeosun

Piet Battiau

Elise Bean

Monica Bhatia

Allison Christians

Tim Cook

Rita de la Feria

Caroline Flint

Judith Freedman

Chrystia Freeland

Pravin Gordhan

Orrin Hatch

Meg Hillier

Mulyani Indrawati

Lou Jiwei

Paul Johnson

Stephanie Johnston

Chris Jordan

Pravind Jugnauth

Wang Jun

Jean-Claude Juncker

Kathleen Kerrigan

Christine Lagarde

Werner Langen

Jolyon Maugham

Angela Merkel

Narendra Modi

Will Morris

Michael Noonan

Grace Perez-Navarro

Platform for the Collaboration on Tax

Donato Raponi

Pascal Saint-Amans

Heather Self

Robert Stack

Tax Justice Network

The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)

Transparency International

US Committee on Ways and Means

Rodrigo Valdés

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Gift this article