Craving a bit of substance

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Craving a bit of substance

I've never been one for fine dining. Don't get me wrong, I love flavour, freshness and fancy food, but to be honest I find myself in the same boat as the tax authorities. Something can be intricately and expensively assembled and put in front of me ever so politely, but what I really crave at the end of the day is substance.

This year is shaping up to be one of the busiest yet for the tax profession – as ITR warned in its February issue. One of the areas where this is being experienced most is tax planning.

The phrase 'tax planning' has, during the past few years, started to carry some negative connotations. For some members of the public, and many tax justice campaigners, 'tax planning' has become a euphemism for aggressive tax avoidance.

At ITR, we like to treat words as words – and this year, planning your taxes is as important as ever. Countries are preparing for BEPS in earnest, bringing in reams of legislation, as evidenced by many of this month's International Updates, mentioning the BEPS project. A big theme of this kind of legislation, and the way tax authorities are now examining companies' tax affairs, is the principle of substance over form.

And US tax reform, of course, means that many tax structures will require tweaking or overhauling as companies seek to find the best position to deal with two of the major talking points within it: the base erosion anti-avoidance tax and the global intangible low-taxed income provisions.

So as you dash between the Tax Planning Survey's rankings tables like the poor overworked waiter on our front cover, do pay attention to the words in between, where ITR's editorial staff have dissected many of the issues professionals should be planning for.

But that's not all we have in this month's magazine. Before you reach for pièce de résistance, we have a wide selection of entrées. There's news analysis, Keith Brockman's regular column, an exploration of anti-profiteering regulations and not one but two features on digital taxation issues.

And, once you've digested the main course of the cover story, there is a trio of delectable European desserts: Special features from Germany and Malta, and a report of our successful Indirect Tax Forum, which was held in Amsterdam in March with speakers from the OECD and European Commission, among others.

Bon appétit!

Joe Stanley-Smith

Editor, International Tax Review
joseph.stanley-smith@euromoneyplc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Magnus Pantzar is set to join as managing director after spending nearly a decade as EQT’s global head of tax
The OECD’s project was up for debate as Matt Williams spoke to ITR following BDO’s tax strategist survey, which uncovered increased complexity and costs among multinationals
Sponsored by Deloitte
Sameer Nurmohamed, partner, Deloitte Legal Canada
Sponsored by Deloitte
George Ankomah, partner, Tax & Regulatory Services, Deloitte Africa (Ghana)
The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
The big four spin-off firm becomes Taxand’s second UK member; in other news, Haynes Boone launched a UK tax practice
Sponsored by Deloitte Luxembourg
Jean-Michel Henry and Mona El-Begawi of Deloitte Luxembourg examine the complexities created by timing differences in Luxembourg, EU, and OECD tax regimes
Stephanie Pantelidaki’s economic expertise will give Norton Rose Fulbright’s other teams ‘extra firepower,’ she says
Sponsored by MFA Legal & Tech
Samuel Fernandes de Almeida of MFA Legal & Tech assesses whether Portugal’s 7.5% surcharge on non-residents aligns with the EU’s free movement of capital principle and passes the proportionality test
Sponsored by McCarthy Tétrault
Senior McCarthy Tétrault tax practitioners highlight significant updates and implications for multinationals as Canada’s transfer pricing rules become more closely aligned with OECD guidance
Gift this article