Australia to cut corporate tax rate

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia to cut corporate tax rate

wayne-swan.jpg

Wayne Swan, Australia’s Deputy Prime Minister and Treasurer, has released draft legislation to cut the corporate tax rate by one percentage point to 29%.

Swan indicated that the cut is designed to “help Australian businesses right across the economy – including the many businesses that are not in the mining boom fast lane and face challenges such as those flowing from a higher dollar”.

The rate will apply to all companies from 2013-14.

“Cutting the company tax rate will increase productivity, promote broad-based economic growth and encourage more investment and jobs across Australia’s entire economy,” said Swan.

The reduction is being funded by the minerals resource rent tax (MRRT) – a tax on the profits of Australian mining companies, due to commence on July 1, with Swan saying “it is one of the ways the Gillard government is spreading the benefits of the nation’s mineral wealth”.

“The timing is being driven by efforts to get the minerals tax through the parliament, but one percentage point is not enough,” said Jonathon Leek, partner at Corrs Chambers Westgarth – Taxand Australia. “The Henry Review recommended a corporate tax rate of 25% to make Australia internationally competitive. But the government is determined to deliver a budget surplus in 2013 and everything else is taking a back seat to that priority. So there is no further reduction on the horizon.”

Political opponents are not supporting the reduction, though the position of opposition leader Tony Abbott is not clear.

“The opposition is opposing the cut on the basis it is to compensate for a tax rise in the form of the minerals tax which they oppose, but the opposition has also suggested a 1.5% cut, so its position is also unclear,” added Leek.

The Business Council of Australia has said that if the MRRT is to be implemented, then a company tax cut is “essential for the strength of the Australian economy”.

Jock McCormack, partner at DLA Piper, said the move is a sensible ploy by the Gillard government.

“It appears, like the possible rollback of tax losses being proposed, to be an initiative to be seen to be doing something for small business without a significant cost or revenue,” he said.

FURTHER READING:

Gillard’s indirect tax plans still ruffling feathers

Carbon tax continues to inflame Australians

Carbon tax could hit South Africa within a year

Why Australia’s carbon tax will prove ineffective

Why 2012 could be a big year for Australian tax reform

Australian steel company wants government handout over carbon tax

Australia’s mining tax continues to come under fire

Australia’s carbon tax clears final hurdle






more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

HMRC expects advisers to meet ever-higher compliance criteria. After 24 consecutive qualified audit opinions, many will ask whether HMRC should hold itself to the same standards
The purchase of Marosa represents the second major tax tech consolidation this week, raising questions of a broader industry trend
Peru’s approach to TP is increasingly at odds with OECD-style profitability policies, exposing multinational groups to asymmetric tax adjustments
Hany Elnaggar examines how the region's legacy economic substance regimes and the OECD's pillar two framework are converging on the same underlying test
The deals for TP Accurate and Intra Pricing Solutions will enhance Alphatax’s ability to support clients with the full TP lifecycle, the tax tech provider claimed
The DS Advocates partner discusses career reinvention, tax disputes and why advisory and litigation experience should complement one another
Lindsay Clayton’s arrival at Baker McKenzie continues the firm’s storied pursuit of ex-US government lawyers, a strategy reinforced by robust World Tax rankings
Shared transaction semantics, governed data and reusable ERP design may prove the most significant benefits of the UK's move to Peppol
As pillar two reshapes global tax competition, the UK faces a crucial challenge: how to remain attractive to multinationals without sacrificing tax revenues
Pillar two may be raising less than expected, but professor René Matteotti says the regime is still changing multinational tax behaviour
Gift this article