Survey: Untangling CFC rules and regimes

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Survey: Untangling CFC rules and regimes

panic

Companies have to navigate a web of differing rules targeting controlled foreign corporations (CFCs) and their shareholders, but the process is far from easy when the distinctions in each country’s rules risk unexpected audits or an unreasonably high tax burden.

Taxpayers can voice their concerns anonymously in International Tax Review’s survey on CFC rules and regimes.

There are a number of different policy drivers for CFC regimes worldwide. Because no one solution would suit all countries, the OECD and EU approaches provide a range of solutions that can be implemented while creating a more coordinated approach to taxing CFCs and their owners.

Share your opinion on the opportunities and challenges of managing tax liabilities across parent companies and their CFCs through our latest tax survey. The survey will end on Friday, May 3 2019

Your responses are strictly anonymous.

There is also the opportunity to provide feedback on tax modelling, US tax reform, the EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive, the implementation of BEPS Action 3 worldwide and how proposals on a potential global minimum corporate tax rate may impact your business.

The results will be featured across a series of articles online and compiled in International Tax Review’s upcoming magazine issue. 

For further details, or to share your opinions with our editorial team, email danish.mehboob@euromoneyplc.com.

Take the survey here

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

A lack of commitment from major jurisdictions and the associated compliance burden are obstacles facing the OECD initiative
Richard Gregg is no longer fit and proper to be a tax agent, said the TPB; in other news, MHA completed its acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Recent Indian case law emphasises the importance of economic substance over mere legal form in evaluating tax implications, say authors from Khaitan & Co
PepsiCo was represented by PwC, while the ATO was advised by MinterEllison, an Australian-headquartered law firm
Three tax experts dissect the impact of a 30% tariff that has shaken up trade relations between South Africa and the US
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Americas Tax Awards
As we move into an era of ‘substance over form’, determining the fundamental nature of a particular instrument is key when evaluating the tax implications of selling hybrid securities
It stands in stark contrast to a mere 1% increase in firmwide revenue since last year
It follows a court case concerning a Freedom of Information request lodged by the founder of a software company
After years of deafening silence, the UK tax authority is taking overdue action against corporates that fail to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion
Gift this article