International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 33,174 results that match your search.33,174 results
  • A new case has changed how employees of Japanese subsidiaries of foreign companies are taxed on their stock options. Ryuichi Tajima, Doug Rosser, Jonathan Stuart-Smith and Jonathan Golub of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, Tokyo explain why corporates need to review their plans
  • Transfer pricing professionals face a new challenge. Francois Vincent, Steven D Harris and Paul Burns of KPMG report on the case that is changing the landscape in North America
  • Multinationals doing business in the US should be worried about how the Thomas Bill will affect their business. PricewaterhouseCoopers' Oscar Teunissen and Larry Skor in New York and Christine Halphen, Steve Nauheim and Linden Smith in Washington DC explain why
  • 1. Corporate tax compliance
  • Significant tax reform has come into force in Spain effective January 1 2003. It affects personal income tax and some aspects of non-resident income tax and corporate income tax. In the October 2002 issue of International Tax Review, this column anticipated some aspects of the reform, which was then underway. All such changes have remained unaltered in the final wording of the law. Other changes worth mentioning are as follows.
  • Companies doing business in Argentina in 2002 were affected by a dramatic change of the applicable legal framework.
  • Retailer Marks & Spencer may have lost its tax appeal against the UK Inland Revenue, but it is not all bad news for companies looking for equal treatment throughout the EU.
  • Michiel Sunderman of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer reveals how recent cases and legislation have improved the participation exemption regime in the Netherlands, particularly as it applies to options
  • As part of its tax reforms, Belgium has reworked its participation exemption and withholding tax regime. Kurt De Haen of PricewaterhouseCoopers analyzes the implications
  • Proposed revisions to the Commentaries to Article V of the OECD Model Treaty could increase the risk of double taxation for service providers whose employees spend significant time on the client's premises.