Brazil’s income tax exemption on dividends

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil’s income tax exemption on dividends

braz.jpg

Cristiane Magalhães and Fernanda Fiasco Ribeiro, of Machado Associados, explore a recent opinion (Opinion 202/2013) issued by the Office of the Attorney General of the National Treasury (PGFN) about the tax exemption applicable to the distribution of profits and dividends established by Article 10 of Law 9249/95.


The context for the issuance of Opinion 202/2013 involves Law 11638/07 which introduced significant changes in the Brazilian accounting rules, seeking convergence with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) adopted in main capital markets.

Aiming at neutralising the tax consequences that would arise from the recognition of revenues, costs and expenses according to such new rules, the Federal Government established the Transitory Taxation System (RTT).

Under the RTT regime (use of which has been mandatory since 2010), legal entities must calculate their tax basis according to the criteria and accounting rules in force on December 31 2007. Such regime encompasses the corporate income tax, the social contribution on net profit and the social contributions on revenues (locally called PIS and COFINS).

In response to the tax authorities’ consultation on the extent of the tax exemption granted under article 10 of Law 9249, PGFN issued the Opinion 202/2013. The Attorney General considered that the exemption rule could not be applied without considering the neutrality brought by RTT, thus concluding that the exemption would only be applied up to the value of profits ascertained according to the accounting rules in force on December 31 2007 (fiscal profit). Therefore, any amount distributed in excess to the fiscal profit should be considered as taxable to the beneficiaries.

Alongside other arguments to defend that this conclusion is not correct, we could mention that according to the Brazilian tax rules taxation cannot be imposed by a mere extensive interpretation of a tax rule. Brazilian constitution requires the issuance of a law to create or increase taxes. Furthermore, there is no guidance on how this taxation should be implemented since previous legislation that deals with the taxation of the distribution of dividends was revoked by Article 10 of Law 9249 and cannot be applied.

We expect a review of this Opinion and will inform in case there are further developments on the matter.

Cristiane Magalhães (cmagalhaes@machadoassociados.com.br) and Fernanda Fiasco Ribeiro (ffiasco@machadoassociados.com.br) are members of Machado Associados, principal Corporate Tax correspondent for Brazil. They are based in the firm’s Sao Paulo office.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The long-running dispute centres on Medtronic’s use of the comparable uncontrolled transaction TP method; in other news, Paul Hastings and FTI Consulting both made double tax hires
The boutique Australian firm’s TP award recognition proves that world-class advisory services aren’t limited to the ‘big four’, the firm’s founder tells ITR
Canadian and Indian dual VAT models have been a source of inspiration for the Brazilian model, but the latter has unique and innovative features, the OECD paper claimed
More sophisticated use of technology, heightened TP scrutiny and stricter filing requirements are making South African Revenue Service audits a formidable challenge
The hire of Doug Wick expands Baker McKenzie’s state and local tax practice and adds to the firm’s growing ex-IRS expertise
One year after Nuwaru joined the WTS network, leaders James Jobson and Matthew Missaghi reflect on the firm’s mission to offer mid-tier pricing but deliver top-tier results
Join ITR's Head of Research, John Harrison, for an overview of key dates, new developments, best practices, and more for next year’s research cycle
The president’s tariff regime has already caused misery for taxpayers. Losing at the Supreme Court would mean it was all for nothing
The US itself was the biggest loser of tax revenue to American multinationals’ profit shifting, the Tax Justice Network reported; in other news, firms made key tax hires
Identifying who will bear the costs and concerns around confidentiality are issues yet to be resolved, advisers say
Gift this article