Brazil’s income tax exemption on dividends

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil’s income tax exemption on dividends

braz.jpg

Cristiane Magalhães and Fernanda Fiasco Ribeiro, of Machado Associados, explore a recent opinion (Opinion 202/2013) issued by the Office of the Attorney General of the National Treasury (PGFN) about the tax exemption applicable to the distribution of profits and dividends established by Article 10 of Law 9249/95.


The context for the issuance of Opinion 202/2013 involves Law 11638/07 which introduced significant changes in the Brazilian accounting rules, seeking convergence with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) adopted in main capital markets.

Aiming at neutralising the tax consequences that would arise from the recognition of revenues, costs and expenses according to such new rules, the Federal Government established the Transitory Taxation System (RTT).

Under the RTT regime (use of which has been mandatory since 2010), legal entities must calculate their tax basis according to the criteria and accounting rules in force on December 31 2007. Such regime encompasses the corporate income tax, the social contribution on net profit and the social contributions on revenues (locally called PIS and COFINS).

In response to the tax authorities’ consultation on the extent of the tax exemption granted under article 10 of Law 9249, PGFN issued the Opinion 202/2013. The Attorney General considered that the exemption rule could not be applied without considering the neutrality brought by RTT, thus concluding that the exemption would only be applied up to the value of profits ascertained according to the accounting rules in force on December 31 2007 (fiscal profit). Therefore, any amount distributed in excess to the fiscal profit should be considered as taxable to the beneficiaries.

Alongside other arguments to defend that this conclusion is not correct, we could mention that according to the Brazilian tax rules taxation cannot be imposed by a mere extensive interpretation of a tax rule. Brazilian constitution requires the issuance of a law to create or increase taxes. Furthermore, there is no guidance on how this taxation should be implemented since previous legislation that deals with the taxation of the distribution of dividends was revoked by Article 10 of Law 9249 and cannot be applied.

We expect a review of this Opinion and will inform in case there are further developments on the matter.

Cristiane Magalhães (cmagalhaes@machadoassociados.com.br) and Fernanda Fiasco Ribeiro (ffiasco@machadoassociados.com.br) are members of Machado Associados, principal Corporate Tax correspondent for Brazil. They are based in the firm’s Sao Paulo office.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Tax teams are responding to usual client demand in the region, albeit with increased working from home flexibility, local sources indicate
A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Tom Goldstein, who was represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, denied wilfully cheating on his taxes and blamed errors on his staff
Multinationals face rising TP scrutiny as global rules diverge. As Daniel Moalusi argues, strong, consistent documentation is now essential to minimise audit risk and protect tax positions
Gift this article