Brazil: Tax consequences of adopting international accounting standards

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Tax consequences of adopting international accounting standards

Taxpayers in Brazil should be aware of the impact on their compliance requirements of a new May 2014 law relating to tax and IFRS.

In December 2007, Brazil adopted the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for the preparation of all financial statements issued after 2008. The adoption of these new accounting standards was defined by law (Law 11.638/07) in an immediate and mandatory way.

Fundamentally, the main change resulting from the new accounting parameters consisted of the fact that the financial statements have come to be prepared under a strictly accounting perspective, without any kind of interference. This is absolutely different from the accounting standards adopted until December 31 2007, which were premised on the satisfaction of tax criteria.

Despite the adoption of IFRS, Brazil’s tax laws were not adapted to follow the changes in accounting standards. As a consequence, a complete distinction between the accounting and tax bases have become reality.

To minimise these consequences, and especially because the law that amended the accounting standards specifically mentioned that any tax impacts derived from the new criteria could be verified, the Temporary Tax Regime (TTR) was created. This regime was intended to neutralise any differences between accounting criteria upon IFRS (effective from 2008) and tax rules that have been premised on the accounting criteria in force until December 2007.

To neutralise the tax effects, the TTR, in practical terms, meant that taxpayers should keep two sets of accounts: (i) one according to the IFRS, and (ii) another according to strict fiscal criteria.

Due to the complexity and high costs involved in maintaining two different sets of accounts, much was expected to happen regarding the adequacy of tax law for IFRS. However, the TTR, which was created in 2008 to be in force for a temporary period, remained in force until the publication of Law 12,973 in May 2014.

This new law has brought many new tax rules. The premise of these rules is the taxation on a permanent basis, as from the economic facts recorded in the books according to international accounting standards. Thus, the determination of corporate taxes from the revenues and expenses recorded in accordance with IFRS criteria avoids the maintenance of two accounts and puts an end to the TTR.

Under such new law, taxpayers are required to comply with these new rules from 2015. They can opt to anticipate their application for the 2014 tax year.

The new law introduced numerous changes for the most varied situations and a lot of specific details must be observed. In summary, it is important to note that both the exemption of dividends from Brazilian sources and the possibility of a tax benefit resulting from the amortisation of goodwill in M&A transactions will continue. Brazil has a very complex tax system and it is important to be aware of the complexity of such new rules for compliance to avoid tax contingencies.

Alessandro Amadeu da Fonseca (afonseca@mattosfilho.com.br), is a partner of Mattos Filho.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Luxembourg’s reform agenda continues at pace in 2025, with targeted measures for start-ups and alternative investment funds
Veteran Elizabeth Arrendale will lead the new advisory practice, which will support clients with M&A tax structuring, post-deal integration, and more
MAP cases keep increasing, and cases closed aren’t keeping pace with the number started, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also told an ITR summit
Nobody likes paperwork or paying money, but the assertion that legal accreditation doesn’t offer value to firms and clients alike is false
Ryan hopes the buyout will help it expand into Asia and the Middle East; in other news, three German finance ministers have called for a suspension of pillar two
SKAT, which was represented by Pinsent Masons, had accused Sanjay Shah and other defendants of fraudulent dividend tax refund claims
TP managers must be able to explain technical issues in simple terms, ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum heard
Prudential had challenged HMRC over VAT group relief; in other news, Donald Trump unveiled timber and wood tariffs, and the European Commission published a ViDA implementation strategy
Australia’s CbCR rules have ‘widespread support’ and do not put American companies at a competitive disadvantage, the FACT Coalition said
Baker McKenzie advised two of the member firms involved, while several advisers provided transaction counsel to US-based Grant Thornton Advisors
Gift this article