Mexico: New criteria to withhold VAT to foreign residents

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: New criteria to withhold VAT to foreign residents

cuellar.jpg

nava.jpg

David Cuellar


Marco Nava

On May 31 2013 the Mexican tax authorities issued non-binding criteria on the application of the value added tax (VAT) law regarding VAT withholding to foreign residents, when certain transactions are carried out with Mexican taxpayers. According to the Mexican VAT Law, Mexican taxpayers are obliged to withhold and remit 16% VAT on the acquisition or leasing of tangible goods that are sold or granted by a foreign resident without a permanent establishment (PE) in Mexico. With this mechanism, Mexican taxpayers withhold the corresponding VAT and, if certain conditions are met, they can credit such VAT.

Additionally, the Mexican VAT law establishes that a foreign resident would be deemed as resident in Mexican territory for VAT purposes when it has one or more establishments (which may be intrepreted as not necessarily permanent, but just an establishment) for all the activities carried out therein. Consequently, there was an interpretation which suggested that some foreigners may be tax residents in Mexico for VAT purposes but not for income tax purposes and therefore the 16% withholding VAT resulted not applicable, without taking into consideration whether they have a PE in Mexico, or not.

In this regard, the Mexican tax authorities issued new criteria establishing that when a foreign resident without a PE in Mexico carries out activities regarding the acquisition or leasing of tangible goods in Mexico, the PE definition in the income tax law or in the tax treaties concluded by Mexico should be applicable; and it should be deemed as a non-binding criteria when a foreign resident with no PE in Mexico carries out these types of activities and the Mexican taxpayer does not withhold VAT, considering that the foreign resident is resident in Mexico for VAT purposes.

If an annual statutory tax report needs to be filed to the Mexican tax authorities by the auditor of a Mexican taxpayer, the auditor should disclose whether non-binding criteria were applied by the taxpayer, so these transactions should be reviewed in detail during the audit process.

It is recommended that foreign residents carefully structure their operations when leasing or selling tangible goods to Mexican residents on a case-by-case basis, and determine the corresponding tax consequences that may arise in Mexico both for income tax and VAT purposes.

David Cuellar (david.cuellar@mx.pwc.com) and Marco Nava (marco.a.nava@us.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +52 55 5263 5816

Fax: +52 55 5263 6010

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Tom Goldstein, who was represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, denied wilfully cheating on his taxes and blamed errors on his staff
Multinationals face rising TP scrutiny as global rules diverge. As Daniel Moalusi argues, strong, consistent documentation is now essential to minimise audit risk and protect tax positions
The profession is fundamentally restructuring itself around what tax and accounting work should be, a Thomson Reuters leader told ITR
Gift this article