Editorial

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Editorial

Reform is the flavour of the decade in the tax world, as multilateral organisations have undertaken wide reviews of international tax rules, with the aim of modernising them to reflect changes to the way businesses operate in a globalised world.

Whether part of the OECD or not, countries in the region are keeping a close eye on international developments, though there are differing views on the level of engagement the organisation has had with non-member developing countries.

National governments have also conducted reforms to ensure regimes tie in with, rather than work against, such multilateral efforts while also remaining attractive to investors. This is a delicate balance. And Latin America is no different.

But not all in the region are conforming to international reform trends. Flying in the face of the global "race to the bottom" of reducing corporate tax rates, Chile is actually raising its rate. But the hike is gradual, and even then the new rate will stand around the OECD average.

Mexico's reform package also bucked the trend of declining corporate tax rates. Scheduled reductions, from 30% to 29% in 2014, and to 28% in 2015, were repealed this year.

Despite these reforms, taxpayers must still navigate a complex compliance environment, and tax technology is not easing the burden. This is nothing new, but contending with Brazilian transfer pricing rules and technology changes brought in to deal with Big Data is the latest example of technology hindering rather than helping.

This summer, Brazil had the eyes of the world upon it as it hosted the FIFA World Cup, and the 2016 Olympics is up next. Further infrastructure investment will be a part of those preparations, and tax incentives may play a key role.

FDI to Latin America rose 5% in 2013 to almost $185 billion, after a 12% jump the previous year. Mexico in particular attracted higher flows, including the $13.2 billion Anheuser-Busch InBev deal to acquire Grupo Modelo. However, the UN predicts modest 1% growth in foreign investment across the region for 2014. Such figures could prompt tax policy changes to maintain attractiveness.

In this context, International Tax Review brings you the 11th edition of its Latin America regional guide, published in association with: Baker & McKenzie, Deloitte, EY, Marval O'Farrell & Mairal, prietocarrizosa and Ulhoa Canto.

The supplement also contains an exclusive interview with Jorge Correa. The Mexican official and OECD secondee shares unique insights on life at the OECD and the Mexican SAT, and the lessons he has taken from one to the other.

Matthew Gilleard

Corporate tax editor, International Tax Review

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
The firms made senior hires in Los Angeles and Cleveland respectively; in other news, South Korea reported an 11% rise in tax income, fuelled by a corporation tax boom
The ‘deeply flawed’ report is attempting to derail UN tax convention debates, the Tax Justice Network’s CEO said
Salim Rahim, a TP specialist, had been a partner at Baker McKenzie since 2010
While the manual should be consulted for any questions around MAPs, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also emphasised that the guidance is ‘not a political commitment’
The landmark Indian Supreme Court judgment redefines GAAR, JAAR and treaty safeguards, rejects protections for indirect transfers and tightens conditions for Mauritius‑based investors claiming DTAA relief
The expansion introduces ‘business-level digital capabilities’ for tax professionals, the US tax agency said
Gift this article