Serbia: Interest on loans between related parties

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Serbia: Interest on loans between related parties

babic.jpg

Filip Babic

According to the new bylaw on interest rates considered to be adhering to the arm's-length principle (published in the Official Gazette RS 17/2014), new interest rates have been prescribed with regards to related party financing transactions. These rates will be used to calculate interest income and interest expense arising from loans provided to or from related parties. The proposed rates are applicable to loans in RSD (Serbian dinar) and loans indexed in foreign currencies such as EUR, USD and CHF.

To determine the appropriate interest rate that should be charged on loans between related parties, taxpayers may choose one of the following options:

  • Use the general regulations regarding transfer pricing with one of the methods used to calculate interest rate; or

  • Use the interest rates prescribed by the Ministry of Finance.

The method chosen by the taxpayer should be applied consistently to all loans provided to or from related parties.

The interest rates prescribed by the Ministry of Finance and considered to be at arm's-length are shown in the box below.

Interest rates prescribed by the Ministry of Finance considered to be at arm’s-length

For banks

3.30% on EUR loans and RSD loans indexed in EUR

2.88% on USD loans and RSD loans indexed in USD

2.21% on CHF loans and RSD loans indexed in CHF

For other taxpayers

17.11% on short term loans in RSD

14.73% on long term loans in RSD

7.88% on short term loans in EUR and RSD loans indexed in EUR

6.55% on long term loans in EUR and RSD loans indexed in EUR

9.25% on short term loans in CHF and RSD loans indexed in CHF

6.30% on long term loans in CHF and RSD loans indexed in CHF

7.57% on short term loans in USD and RSD loans indexed in USD

5.56% on long term loans in USD and RSD loans indexed in USD


If the use of the loan agreement-defined interest rate for one transaction with a related party is chosen, the taxpayer has to use the same method for all transactions. By the same token, if a taxpayer chooses to use the arm's-length interest rate, then that approach has to be used for all transactions.

Despite the aggressive approach of the Serbian tax authorities with regards to related party financing transactions, non-resident group companies may still opt to grant loans instead of equity contributions to their Serbian subsidiaries to take advantage of the beneficial provisions of double tax agreements between Serbia and the relevant states. For example, according to the double tax treaties concluded between Serbia and Germany, France, Norway, the Netherlands, Finland and Sweden a 0% withholding tax rate is imposed on interest payments abroad whereas a withholding tax rate ranging from 5% to 15% may be suffered on dividend payments.

In addition, according to the Serbian thin capitalisation rules, interest expense and other related expenses are allowed as deductible provided that the loans obtained from related parties do not exceed four times the net equity of the company (10 times for banks and leasing companies).

Filip Babic (filip.babic@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global, Belgrade office

Tel: +381 11 3241 484

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
The firm’s eye-catching UK launch is a major statement of intent, but it will face stern opposition in its quest to be the top global tax player
The postponement came after industry representatives flagged implementation issues with the registration regime; in other news, firms made key tax partner additions
Despite the increased yield, the time taken to resolve enquiries was at a six-year high, new HMRC statistics have revealed
The High Court’s dismissal of barrister Setu Kamal’s legal challenge represents the first successful strike-out under a new law on SLAPPs
IP lawyers, who say they are encouraging clients to build up ‘tariff resilience’, should treat the risks posed by recent orders as a core consideration in cross-border licensing
Gift this article