Luxembourg: Luxembourg amends participation exemption regime

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Luxembourg: Luxembourg amends participation exemption regime

schmitz-merle.jpg

Samantha Schmitz-Merle

On August 5 2015, a draft law was presented to Parliament, which implements some recent amendments to the EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive (PSD) into Luxembourg law. The amendments aim to stop situations of double non-taxation created by the use of certain hybrid instruments and to incorporate a general anti-abuse rule (GAAR) into the EU Parent-Subsidiary regime. The amendments will apply to dividend income allocated after December 31 2015.

Eradicating double non-taxation

Beginning in 2016, dividends received by a Luxembourg company from another EU undertaking within the meaning of the EU PSD will no longer benefit from the corporate income tax (CIT) exemption provided by article 166 Income Tax Law (ITL) and from the municipal business tax (MBT) exemption provided by paragraph 9 of the MBT Law if the dividends are tax deductible in the other EU member state.

In other words, if the EU jurisdiction of source (jurisdiction of the subsidiary of the Luxembourg company) qualifies the instrument as a debt instrument and treats the payment made under this instrument as a tax-deductible interest payment, Luxembourg will no longer exempt the dividend income at the level of the Luxembourg company, based on the Luxembourg participation exemption regime.

Provided the other conditions of the participation regime are met, the exemption regime will only remain applicable if the income is treated as a dividend and is, as such, not tax deductible in the source country.

New GAAR

Beginning in 2016, a new general anti-abuse rule (GAAR) will be introduced which will apply both to the CIT and MBT exemption regime of dividends received by Luxembourg companies, and to the regime of withholding tax exemption on dividends paid by Luxembourg companies to other EU companies.

According to the draft law, dividends received by a Luxembourg company from another EU undertaking within the meaning of the EU PSD will no longer benefit from the Luxembourg CIT and MBT exemption from article 166 ITL and section 9 MBT Law if "they are allocated as part of an arrangement or series of arrangements that, having been put into place for the main purpose or one of the main purposes of obtaining a tax advantage which defeats the object or purpose of this Directive, are not genuine having regard to all relevant facts and circumstances. An arrangement or a series of arrangements, which may comprise several steps or parts, is considered as 'not genuine' if it is not put into place for valid commercial reasons which reflect economic reality."

In addition, dividends distributed to another EU undertaking will no longer benefit from the Luxembourg withholding tax exemption provided by Article 147 ITL if the allocation of the dividend is made under the conditions defined in the GAAR mentioned above.

The new GAAR is not commented further in the draft law. It will, as most GAARs generally do, since they are a matter of many various interpretations, introduce some legal uncertainty, pending deeper analysis of the concept by EU bodies (especially the ECJ). What is certain is that, to reduce the chances of GAAR application, taxpayers will have to scrutinise economic substance more than ever when structuring their investments within the EU.

What will not change?

The draft law only implements recent changes at EU level, which means that:

  • The amendments will only impact the tax treatment of dividends received from or paid to another EU undertaking and will not apply to dividends received from or paid to non-EU undertakings;

  • The amendments to be introduced will only impact dividend distributions, meaning that the Luxembourg capital gains exemption regime remains unchanged (no GAAR introduced); and

  • The conditions for the exemption of the participation for net wealth tax purposes remain unchanged (no GAAR introduced).

Other changes

Lastly, the draft law amends the list of EU undertakings within the meaning of the EU PSD so as to add new legal forms of Romanian and Polish companies.

Samantha Schmitz-Merle (samantha.merle@atoz.lu)

Atoz – Taxand

Tel: +352 26 940 235

Website: www.atoz.lu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

New reforms represent the most seismic shift in Canadian TP legislation since its enactment and a clear inflection point for MNEs, ITR has heard
Spain did not transpose EU VAT rules for SMEs or works of art; in other news, an increased VAT threshold came into force in South Africa
While the IBS incorporates taxable events previously covered by state and municipal taxes, its governance and operational logic represent a significant departure from the legacy model
The new office on the fourth floor of 4 More London will span 14,230 square feet, with the potential to expand to the first and second floors
MNEs now face a shift from modelling to execution as the side‑by‑side deal forces tax teams to upgrade systems, harmonise data, and prevent costly pillar two mismatches
As recent surveys suggest a disconnect between AI adoption and employee engagement, the big four risk digging themselves into a strategic hole
Almost three-quarters of surveyed tax professionals are concerned about inaccurate AI outputs; in other news, Dentons hired a partner from CMS to lead its Belgian tax team
Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
Gift this article