Serbia: Treaty analysis: Serbia ratifies DTA with South Korea

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Serbia: Treaty analysis: Serbia ratifies DTA with South Korea

Rafailovic

Aleksandra Rafailovic

On February 24 2016, Serbia expanded its double tax treaty network by ratifying the Agreement for the avoidance of double taxation with respect to taxes on income, signed with the Republic of Korea on January 22 2016.

The treaty closely follows the standard OECD contract model, but differs in terms of the withholding tax rates applicable, which have been defined as follows:

  • Dividends

  • 5% ( if the recipient company holds at least 25% of the dividend-paying company)

  • 10% ( in all other cases);

  • Interest – 10%;

  • Royalties

  • 5% (for the use of, or the right to use, any copyrights of literary, artistic or scientific work including cinematography films, films or tapes for television or radio)

  • 10% (applicable for the use of, or the right to use any patent, trademark, design or model, plan, secret formula or process as well as industrial, commercial or scientific equipment or for information concerning industrial, commercial or scientific experience).

Some other specific details include:

  • A building site or construction or installation project constitutes a permanent establishment only if it lasts more than 12 months.

  • Penalty interest rate shall not be regarded as interest for purposes of this Agreement (Article 11)

By signing the above-mentioned treaty, South Korea also becomes one of the countries exempt from the withholding tax on service fees paid to non-resident legal entities which was introduced in Serbia as of March 1 2016.

Following the ratification of the agreement and the publishing of the ratification law in the Official Gazette – International Treaties No. 4/2016, the treaty becomes officially binding and will enter into force as of January 1 2017.

Aleksandra Rafailovic (aleksandra.rafailovic@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global Belgrade

Tel: +381 11 3241484

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Gift this article